Any solution about this?
On 10/13/06, Diwakoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is the example:
-- begin code ---
unit Unit1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
uses
Classes, SysUtils, LResources, Forms, Controls, Graphics, Dialogs, DBGrids,
DBCtrls, DB, sqldb, mysql50conn, Buttons;
type
{
Hi
Why is it that every body and anything got a Dot Net version? Even
Borland's got a dot net enabled Delphi coming it seems. Some say that
Microsoft got Dot net idea from Delphi.
In Linux there is a mono project. What could the advantages be ? Is it
for collaborative development? Where does
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 15:07, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> I hope Den Jean can unify his qt4 unit.
I am working on it. First results have been posted in
a temporary unstable section (V1.20):
http://users.pandora.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/fpcqt4.html
Can everyone compile/test/complain :-)
Mer
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 10/16/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, on windows they work with ansi, on linux it it is just what is
specified a s LANG. No conversion is made.
But if you consider that the IDE won't run correctly on linux with
utf-8, in reality we only su
On 10/16/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, on windows they work with ansi, on linux it it is just what is
specified a s LANG. No conversion is made.
But if you consider that the IDE won't run correctly on linux with
utf-8, in reality we only support iso encodings today.
Option2
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 10/16/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO there are 2 ways to solve this:
1) make 2 separate widgetstes. Im' not really pro this since it is hard
to maintain and causes a lot of duplicate code. We don't want the same
ifdef mess we have with gtk1
On 10/16/06, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO there are 2 ways to solve this:
1) make 2 separate widgetstes. Im' not really pro this since it is hard
to maintain and causes a lot of duplicate code. We don't want the same
ifdef mess we have with gtk1/2 again.
2) Load the functions at r
Borut Maricic wrote:
All Unicode related code must remain under IFDEFs, not contaminating
the ANSI version of Win32 widgetset because Unicode code is
experimental, and we are approaching 1.0, and if we don´t isolate it,
we may break Win32 interface, or delay 1.0 by introducing bugs. (Like
the lac
