Thanks, that fixed it...
On 10/28/07, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:05:03 -0500
> "Matt Henley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am using fpc 2.2 installed from gentoo with the sources installed
> > and lazarus from svn (rev 12621). I have set the lazaru
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:05:03 -0500
"Matt Henley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using fpc 2.2 installed from gentoo with the sources installed
> and lazarus from svn (rev 12621). I have set the lazarus directory
> and can compile and run a simple single form project.. however, when I
> try to
I am using fpc 2.2 installed from gentoo with the sources installed
and lazarus from svn (rev 12621). I have set the lazarus directory
and can compile and run a simple single form project.. however, when I
try to install a pkg file (in this case tagraph), I get an error of
Compiling lazarus.pp
la
I would recomend asking on a sqlite dedicated forum or mailling list.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.f
Hi:
2007/10/28, TOUZEAU DAVID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> unit1.pas(51,18) Error: Identifier not found "ftAutoInc"
> unit1.pas(52,20) Error: Identifier not found "ftString"
> uses
> Classes, SysUtils, LResources, Forms, Controls, Graphics, Dialogs,dbf,
> Buttons;
Try to import "Db" unit.
G
Hello, I wrote this code:
unit Unit1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
interface
uses
Classes, SysUtils, LResources, Forms, Controls, Graphics, Dialogs,
Sqlite3ds, db;
type
{ TForm1 }
TForm1 = class(TForm)
procedure FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
private
{ private declarations }
public
> > TDBGWATCH_DOCHANGED, line 2636 of debugger.pp
>
> Only one line?
> No context?
In the XTerm window, there was only this one line. Would I be able to
see a longer stack trace somewhere else?
Cheers,
Tobias
_
To unsubscribe
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:48:22 +0100
Tobias Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you provide an example and/or backtrace?
It's hard to create on purpose. Here's a stack trace:
TDBGWATCH_DOCHANGED, line 2636 of debugger.pp
Only one line?
No context?
I just ran into t
Dear
I use Lazarus 0.9.22 on Linux I386 Ubuntu Gusty (Debian 4)
I would like to use tdbf component.
But when i compile i have errors :
unit1.pas(19,36) Hint: Parameter "Dbf" not used
unit1.pas(19,51) Hint: Parameter "DoCreate" not used
unit1.pas(51,18) Error: Identifier not found "ftAutoInc"
un
On 28/10/2007, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> see for example LCLProc DumpStack
>
Thanks Mattias. That's exactly what I was looking for and it works
perfectly. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI to
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:48:18 +0200
"Graeme Geldenhuys" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody know how I can programmatically create a backtrace from
> within my code?
>
> For example:
> If I want a backtrace at a certain point in my code, I raise and
> exception. Run the program through
Hi,
Anybody know how I can programmatically create a backtrace from within my code?
For example:
If I want a backtrace at a certain point in my code, I raise and
exception. Run the program through GDB, break at fpc exceptions and
then ask GDB for a backtrace.
Could I ask FPC to output a backtr
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:48:22 +0100
Tobias Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you provide an example and/or backtrace?
>
> It's hard to create on purpose. Here's a stack trace:
>
> TDBGWATCH_DOCHANGED, line 2636 of debugger.pp
Only one line?
No context?
> I'll try what happens when I d
As I mentioned in another post. Maybe take a look at MSEide for ideas
of such a dialog.
Graeme.
On 28/10/2007, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:21:04AM +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> > If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I thi
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:21:04AM +0100, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> If the compiler options dialog is to be redesigned I think it would be
> an oportunity to get customized build modes, like: Release, Debug,
> AnythingElse
Yes, and additional should be definable by the user.
__
On 27/10/2007, Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Moreover if I attempt to open an fpc project (.lpi) the same thing
> happens most of the times, no editor window. I can open the project
> inspector, select a file, but when I click "open" nothing happens.
>
I don't think that is related
> > The odd ball license choice ("wxwindows license") is not my favorite
> > either
> > btw.
>
> Why?
> wxwindows license is a LGPL with exceptions allowing binary
> distribution of code which use library. This licese is like
> RTL/FCL/LCL license.
> SourceForge accepts OSI-approved licenses an
On 28/10/2007, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can provide 2 defaults for new projects: Debug and Release, but
> even those should be editable so projects don't need "dead" modes
> which are just there by IDE idiosincrasy
>
> I gave some thougth to it, but I am not real
From: "Marco van de Voort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:16:09 +0300
"Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to specify link to KOL-CE wiki:
> http://wiki.freepascal.org/KOL-CE
There is a bug in kol-ce.
The package inherits source paths (MCK Package Editor / Opt
From: "Mattias Gaertner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:16:09 +0300
"Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Yury Sidorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Today I made the first public release of KOL-CE library.
Sorry, I forgot to specify link to KOL-CE wiki:
http://wiki.freepascal.o
20 matches
Mail list logo
