This is a multi-part message in MIME format. I'm also no license expert, but in some countries (most European included),
reverse engineering to keep a system working is a relative strong right that
can't be waved by EULA. The crucial phrase here is for the customers own
use
IOW, a lot of
I'm also no license expert, but in some countries (most European
included), reverse engineering to keep a system working is a relative
strong right that can't be waved by EULA. The crucial phrase here is
for the customers own use
IOW, a lot of users in a lot of countries have this
Bogusław Brandys wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:57:33 +0100
Dan Stefan Rundberget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am realy sorry to bother everybody with this question but I just can't
use lazarus if I'm not sure I'm doing everything legaly. I guess I
expressed my self a
Vincent Snijders wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but:
GTK is used as dynamic linked library and ordinary LGPL allows using
dynamic linked libraries in applications without distributing the source
of the application.
The modification [in the LCL license] allows you using the LCL in
On 11/29/05, Bogusław Brandys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
On 11/29/05, Bogusław Brandys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When it is expected ? (because I'm still wondering if I should help
improve LazReport (for my closed source application needs) or maybe
better port Report
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:57:33 +0100
Dan Stefan Rundberget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am realy sorry to bother everybody with this question but I just can't
use lazarus if I'm not sure I'm doing everything legaly. I guess I
expressed my self a little unclear. So I will
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.Vincent Snijders wrote:
I am not a lawyer, but:
GTK is used as dynamic linked library and ordinary LGPL allows using
dynamic linked libraries in applications without distributing the source
of the application.
The modification [in the LCL
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 06:29:46 +0100
Dan Stefan Rundberget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you dynamicly link with gtk+ (LGPL) you are forced to give the users
permission to modify the binaries AND reverse engineer them for personal use,
the LCL-LGPL doesn't. This means that even if you staticly
-0800
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] License and other widet sets
Re: On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 06:49 +0100, Dan Stefan Rundberget wrote:
Re: If this just is a stupid question i apologize. Do you --have-- to use a
third party widget set to use lazarus, or are the LCL classes
Dan Stefan Rundberget wrote:
I am realy sorry to bother everybody with this question but I just can't use lazarus if
I'm not sure I'm doing everything legaly. I guess I expressed my self a little unclear.
So I will try again. Joost van der Sluis said that The GTK-library isn't linked
into
Melding-
From: Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:10:58 -0800
To: lazarus@miraclec.com
Subject: Re: [lazarus] License and other widet sets
Re: On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 06:49 +0100, Dan Stefan Rundberget wrote:
Re: If this just is a stupid question i apologize. Do
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.If this just is a stupid question i apologize. Do you --have-- to use a third
party widget set to use lazarus, or are the LCL classes as compleat widget set
it self. Because the widget set itself has a license, which probably isn't
compatible with
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 06:49 +0100, Dan Stefan Rundberget wrote:
If this just is a stupid question i apologize. Do you --have-- to use a third
party widget set to use lazarus, or are the LCL classes as compleat widget
set it self. Because the widget set itself has a license, which probably
13 matches
Mail list logo
