Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:53:52 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
The VirtualTreeView package is a lot big, even when zipped. I'll
try to create a smaller dummy package and will send to you.
I m
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:53:52 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> > The VirtualTreeView package is a lot big, even when zipped. I'll
> > try to create a smaller dummy package and will send to you.
>
> I managed to create a very small
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:42:37 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
[]
It's no trick - it's pascal.
The IDE will never get that flexible. That's why I think, this case
does not need any special IDE magic.
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:42:37 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:59:26 -0300
> > Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> >>
> >>> # There is no rea
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:59:26 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
# There is no real need for conditional options for units
Maybe there's already a solution to this case and i'm missing
something.
On Nov 3, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 23:23:23 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
The ultimate of the ultimate feature would be to be able to compile
a specific target from the command line, and if possible, without
the need of a graphical
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 23:23:23 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> >> The ultimate of the ultimate feature would be to be able to compile
> >> a specific target from the command line, and if possible, without
> >> the need of a graphical interface. This way, you can run your dail
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:59:26 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
> > # There is no real need for conditional options for units
> > Maybe there's already a solution to this case and i'm missing
> > something.
>
> In fact, i already foun
On Nov 2, 2007, at 8:30 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:49:50 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
As we can specify the target OS and arch, I would like to change the
executable name according ti this. The ultimate feature would be the
use of variable. Some
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
# There is no real need for conditional options for units
Maybe there's already a solution to this case and i'm missing something.
In fact, i already found a workaround that i implemented in another
package. I added a dummy unit to the package that uses the
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:56:31 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2)Make units packages/projects optional according to widgetset.
Concrete situation: LCL extensions package has a unit (OleUtils) that
implements TOLEStream. It only makes sense
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:56:31 -0300
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:16:06 +0100
> > Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I miss something with Lazarus. Something quite usefull I think.
> >>
> >> I would
Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Yes, it is discussed from time to time.
It is definitely planned. It is mainly a GUI problem.
Perhaps it would be a good idea to start a wiki and collect some case
studies, so the GUI designers know, what the GUI should manage and what
n
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:49:50 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> As we can specify the target OS and arch, I would like to change the
> executable name according ti this. The ultimate feature would be the
> use of variable. Something like this :
> Target name : foo.${target
On Nov 2, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:16:06 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I miss something with Lazarus. Something quite usefull I think.
I would like to be able to set multiple target, with different
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:16:06 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I miss something with Lazarus. Something quite usefull I think.
I would like to be able to set multiple target, with different
compiler options and different defines at the compilation.
I
On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 16:16:06 +0100
Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I miss something with Lazarus. Something quite usefull I think.
>
> I would like to be able to set multiple target, with different
> compiler options and different defines at the compilation.
>
> It is possible to
On 11/2/07, Milipili Houbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are obviously more important things to do right now but I would
> like to know if there is something like that planned, discussed,
> rejected for some reaons...
We are discussing how to implement it currently.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Ca
I miss something with Lazarus. Something quite usefull I think.
I would like to be able to set multiple target, with different
compiler options and different defines at the compilation.
It is possible to load/save the settings but it is not really easy to
use.
There are obviously more im
19 matches
Mail list logo
