[lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-16 Thread ik
Hi, While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android, there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko (http://openmoko.org/). I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned Lazarus :)). Well

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-16 Thread Marc Weustink
ik wrote: Hi, While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android, there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko (http://openmoko.org/). I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned Lazar

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread Marc Weustink
Marc Weustink wrote: ik wrote: Hi, While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android, there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko (http://openmoko.org/). I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Marc Weustink schrieb: > Marc Weustink wrote: >> ik wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android, >>> there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko >>> (http://openmoko.org/). >>> I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building >>

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread ik
For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ? Thanks, Ido On Jan 20, 2008 9:21 PM, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: > > > > > It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL > > So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fp

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? Great! (not that I grasp the full implications of oabi vs. eabi, but I'd like to make some experiment with my n800, which is an eabi system). Bye -- L

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na ik ha escrit: For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ? oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway "o" stands for "old") is the previous arm binary interface. eabi is the new one. The linux kernel can be compiled with support for one, the other, or

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-20 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Luca Olivetti schrieb: > En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: > >> >> It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL > > So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to fix them. > Great! > (not that I grasp the full

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-21 Thread ik
Thank you for the information :) Ido On Jan 20, 2008 10:12 PM, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En/na ik ha escrit: > > For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ? > > oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway "o" stands for > "old") is the previous

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-21 Thread Marc Weustink
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Luca Olivetti schrieb: En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to fix them. hmm... current openmok

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-21 Thread Marc Weustink
Marc Weustink wrote: Florian Klaempfl wrote: Luca Olivetti schrieb: En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to fix them.

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-22 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit: From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling. Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility? (otherwise I think old style syscalls wouldn't work). And,

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-22 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Marc Weustink schrieb: > Marc Weustink wrote: >> Florian Klaempfl wrote: >>> Luca Olivetti schrieb: En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: > It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? >>> >>> Well, I did initial support. I

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-22 Thread Marc Weustink
Florian Klaempfl wrote: Marc Weustink schrieb: Marc Weustink wrote: Florian Klaempfl wrote: Luca Olivetti schrieb: En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit: It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc? Well, I did initial support. If yo

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-22 Thread Marc Weustink
Luca Olivetti wrote: En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit: From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling. Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility? (otherwise I think old style syscalls

Re: [lazarus] OpenMoko and FPC/Lazarus

2008-01-22 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Marc Weustink schrieb: > Luca Olivetti wrote: >> En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit: >> >>> From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess >>> there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling. >> >> Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?