Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned
Lazarus :)). Well
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and I also mentioned
Lazar
Marc Weustink wrote:
ik wrote:
Hi,
While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
(http://openmoko.org/).
I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
apps in different compilers (FPC to be exact, and
Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>> ik wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> While google suggest rewards for developing applications for Android,
>>> there is an open source firmware named OpenMoko
>>> (http://openmoko.org/).
>>> I asked Michael Shiloh what are some of the requirement in building
>>
For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ?
Thanks,
Ido
On Jan 20, 2008 9:21 PM, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
>
> >
> > It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
>
> So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fp
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Great!
(not that I grasp the full implications of oabi vs. eabi, but I'd like
to make some experiment with my n800, which is an eabi system).
Bye
--
L
En/na ik ha escrit:
For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ?
oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway "o" stands for
"old") is the previous arm binary interface.
eabi is the new one.
The linux kernel can be compiled with support for one, the other, or
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
> En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
>
>>
>> It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
>
> So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
> Great!
> (not that I grasp the full
Thank you for the information :)
Ido
On Jan 20, 2008 10:12 PM, Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En/na ik ha escrit:
> > For someone that does not know arm cpus, what are oabi and eabi ?
>
> oabi (I don't think that's the proper definition, anyway "o" stands for
> "old") is the previous
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
hmm... current openmok
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If you provide bugs reports, I'll try to
fix them.
En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit:
From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess there
is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?
(otherwise I think old style syscalls wouldn't work).
And,
Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Marc Weustink wrote:
>> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>>> Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
> It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
>>>
>>> Well, I did initial support. I
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Marc Weustink schrieb:
Marc Weustink wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Luca Olivetti schrieb:
En/na Florian Klaempfl ha escrit:
It should be enough to build FPC with OPT=-dFPC_ARMEL
So it's now possible to produce eabi code with fpc?
Well, I did initial support. If yo
Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit:
From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess
there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?
(otherwise I think old style syscalls
Marc Weustink schrieb:
> Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> En/na Marc Weustink ha escrit:
>>
>>> From this I assume syscalls in this case are correct and I guess
>>> there is some difference between syscall calling and library calling.
>>
>> Maybe openmoko as an eabi kernel compiled with oabi compatibility?
16 matches
Mail list logo