> >>>
> >>> Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki
> >>> is down). The main server has also been compromised some time ago.
> >>> Since then, I am reluctant to open too much ports.
> >>>
> >>> In reality, the problem is with your ISP, namely that they don't
> >>> see
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some mails on the FPC core list made clear that this option is not
> feasible, because we don't allow password logins on the FPC machines.
>
> The topic is still under consideration.
Thanks for the feedback, awaiting the final answer...
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
I use putty to setup the
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
I use putty to setup the connection. After that I configure svn so that
Hi Michael,
I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in
(it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that
The ssh part requires a username and password though.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only SSH cl
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I do
> What about letting apache listening to a second port ?
I got no idea what my ISP has change, and asking them was a useless
exercise! The only thing I could test on my own, was being able to
connect successfully to all attempted connection via the SVN protocol.
At this stage I am willing to tes
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Marc Weustink wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I don't know, because I don't know
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki
Let's be fair. The above is not confirmed, it may also have been a DOS
attack.
True, but the result is the same: the machine is unusable, and
a lot
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use.
What is the secur
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki
Let's be fair. The above is not confirmed, it may also have been a DOS
attack.
is down). The main server has also been compromised some time ago.
That was simply an easy to guess password mist
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use.
What is the security risk connecting via pla
Hi Michael,
The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our
internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve?
What is the security risk connecting via plain SVN with anonymous
access? I have only ever had anonymous access to Lazarus and FPC, and
always submitted pat
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.or
Hi,
Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider
enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is
enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at
svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/)
I have also heard that using the HTTP pro
15 matches
Mail list logo