Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-04 Thread A.J. Venter
> >>> > >>> Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki > >>> is down). The main server has also been compromised some time ago. > >>> Since then, I am reluctant to open too much ports. > >>> > >>> In reality, the problem is with your ISP, namely that they don't > >>> see

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some mails on the FPC core list made clear that this option is not > feasible, because we don't allow password logins on the FPC machines. > > The topic is still under consideration. Thanks for the feedback, awaiting the final answer...

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Vincent Snijders wrote: Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in (it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that The ssh part requires a username and password though. I use putty to setup the

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Vincent Snijders
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in (it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that The ssh part requires a username and password though. I use putty to setup the connection. After that I configure svn so that

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi Michael, I see the SmartSVN client I sometimes use, has SSH support built-in (it says SVN+SSH for connection type), so could try that The ssh part requires a username and password though. Regards, - Graeme - On 3/3/06, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only SSH cl

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Marc Weustink
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Marc Weustink wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve? I do

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
> What about letting apache listening to a second port ? I got no idea what my ISP has change, and asking them was a useless exercise! The only thing I could test on my own, was being able to connect successfully to all attempted connection via the SVN protocol. At this stage I am willing to tes

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Marc Weustink wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve? I don't know, because I don't know

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki Let's be fair. The above is not confirmed, it may also have been a DOS attack. True, but the result is the same: the machine is unusable, and a lot

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Marc Weustink
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve? I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use. What is the secur

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Micha Nelissen
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: Our german FTP machine was compromised recently (that is why the wiki Let's be fair. The above is not confirmed, it may also have been a DOS attack. is down). The main server has also been compromised some time ago. That was simply an easy to guess password mist

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi Michael, The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve? I don't know, because I don't know what ssh client you use. What is the security risk connecting via pla

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi Michael, The only SSH client I have used is Putty (for Windows) to maintain our internal Linux server. What would such a setup involve? What is the security risk connecting via plain SVN with anonymous access? I have only ever had anonymous access to Lazarus and FPC, and always submitted pat

Re: [lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.or

[lazarus] Repository access via the SVN protocol

2006-03-03 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Hi, Would whoever is running the Free Pascal / Lazarus repository consider enabling the SVN protocol as well. Currently only the HTTP protocol is enabled. (example: GCC has both protocols enabled at svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/ or via http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/) I have also heard that using the HTTP pro