Re: [Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

Hi, It seems ok. cmsCreateProofingTransform is a good choice to do that. Make sure cmsFLAGS_SOFTPROOFING is specified, you can also use jpegicc with -p option to check the functionality. On the other hand, if all input gamut is encompassed by the workspace, yous should see no difference. Regar

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

Am 17.07.08, 07:57 -0500 schrieb Paul Miller: > Okay, I'm not really trying to do proofing. I'm trying to do the image > profile -> working space -> monitor space in one step. Technically, I > should probably be doing file profile->working profile during load, then > working -> monitor during di

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

Hi :) Paul Miller wrote: > Okay, I'm not really trying to do proofing. I'm trying to do the image > profile -> working space -> monitor space in one step. Technically, I > should probably be doing file profile->working profile during load, then > working -> monitor during display, but I though

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

Mike Russell wrote: > From: "Paul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [re proofing a working space profile] >> That makes sense. So is what I'm trying to do "right", or should I be >> using a different method? > > I can only think of one situation where what you are doing would make > sense. If you

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

From: "Paul Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [re proofing a working space profile] > That makes sense. So is what I'm trying to do "right", or should I be > using a different method? I can only think of one situation where what you are doing would make sense. If you have one of the relatively new mon

[Lcms-user] proofing profile seems to have no effect

Can someone tell me if I'm doing this workflow properly? When I use cmsCreateProofingTransform, the "proof" transform doesn't seem to make any difference. I get the file profile from a JPEG file, the monitor profile from CMGetSystemProfile(), and my working profile is selected from a list of a

[Lcms-user] Proofing

Hi, cmsHTRANSFORM cmsCreateProofingTransform( cmsHPROFILE Input, DWORD InputFormat, cmsHPROFILE Output, DWORD OutputFormat, cmsH

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

riginal Message - From: Marti Maria To: Gerhard Fuernkranz ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 5:37 AM Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop Hi Gerhard,>have you an idea, which kind of transforms are actually carried out by >PS, if these options ar

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

m Photoshop. Regards, Marti. - Original Message - From: "Gerhard Fuernkranz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop Marti Maria schrieb: >Photoshop does weird things

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

Marti Maria schrieb: Photoshop does weird things on softproof. I don't doubt the usefulness of Photoshop "emulate white paper", "discount ink black" and so, but I didn't implement all that. Just because, well, these are Photoshop features, not described in ICC spec. Marti, have you an idea, which k

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

Marti. - Original Message - From: H. Holtij To: Marti Maria Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:31 AM Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop thanks for your answer, marti. with "ink black" checked it does indeed look like the photoshop output.

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

AToBx/BToAx tags.>> Regards,> Marti Maria> The little cms project> http://www.littlecms.com>> - Original Message -> From: H. Holtij> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:13 PM> Subject: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop>>> hi,

Re: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

ge - From: H. Holtij To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: [Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop hi, i am seeing a clear difference between proofing in photoshop compared to lcms. i have a tif image (TYPE_BGRA_8) and i want to proof it with a printer profile. th

[Lcms-user] proofing lcms vs photoshop

hi,i am seeing a clear difference between proofing in photoshop comparedto lcms.i have a tif image (TYPE_BGRA_8) and i want to proof it with a printerprofile. the image has no profile attached, so i am using the standardsRGB. output device is my monitor so i am using the appropriateprofile for it (

Re: [Lcms-user] Proofing PS-CRD - How ?

Reinhard Roesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hallo Marti, > > thank you for the answer. I tried this (actualy before I've asked). > > I use two printer-profiles, and icclink creates proof.icc > When I call icc2ps I get the error: Error #3000: Invalid PCS. > (Coming from GetPhase, proof.icc has

Re: [Lcms-user] Proofing PS-CRD - How ?

Hallo Marti, thank you for the answer. I tried this (actualy before I've asked). I use two printer-profiles, and icclink creates proof.icc When I call icc2ps I get the error: Error #3000: Invalid PCS. (Coming from GetPhase, proof.icc has PCS=CMYK). What am I making wrong ? Regards Reinhard [EM

Re: [Lcms-user] Proofing PS-CRD - How ?

Reinhard Roesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hallo List, > > I want to create sthg like a 'proofing crd': > > 1 CIE-Data -> PCS - by CSA > 2 PCS->CMYK(Proofing)-> PCS- by DeviceLinkProfile > 3 PCS->CMYK(Output)- by CRD > > I want to combine 2 and 3 into a single CR

[Lcms-user] Proofing PS-CRD - How ?

Hallo List, I want to create sthg like a 'proofing crd': 1 CIE-Data -> PCS - by CSA 2 PCS->CMYK(Proofing)-> PCS- by DeviceLinkProfile 3 PCS->CMYK(Output)- by CRD I want to combine 2 and 3 into a single CRD. Which functions and processing do I need ? The manual is a bi