Le lundi 7 août 2006 12:13, Olaf Gellert a écrit :
> I was thinking about doing a raw shot of some target
> (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it
> to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever.
> Would that be already sufficient to get good results?
> Or at least beeter than
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Hal V. Engel wrote:
On Saturday 05 August 2006 10:20, Frédéric wrote:
On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:33, Hal V. Engel wrote:
I am not so sure that images in GIMP are "edited in sRGB colorspace".
You are right: I forgot that Gimp let the user choose working colorspace...
Bu
One other comment about workflows. CUPS 1.2 has the ability to handle 16 bit
data where as CUPS 1.x only handles 8 bit color data. Also CUPS 1.2 has the
ability to do color space conversions using ICC profiles. Version 1.2 is
still beta so it will be a while before this is commonly available.
On Monday 07 August 2006 03:54, Frédéric wrote:
> Le lundi 7 août 2006 12:13, Olaf Gellert a écrit :
> > I was thinking about doing a raw shot of some target
> > (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it
> > to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever.
> > Would that be already s
On Monday 07 August 2006 05:27, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> > (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it
> > to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever.
> > Would that be already sufficient to get good results?
> > Or at least beeter than sRGB? Not sure about it...
> >
> > It seems t
> (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it
> to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever.
> Would that be already sufficient to get good results?
> Or at least beeter than sRGB? Not sure about it...
>
> It seems that it is still not too common for manufacturers
> of cameras to
> Shooting in raw does not need to select white balance! This is the
> intersting thing in raw files. All is done in post-process.
Another interesting thing about shooting RAW is that the in-camera
color space setting doesn't matter. The data gets assigned to a color
space during raw convers
Le lundi 7 août 2006 12:13, Olaf Gellert a écrit :
> I was thinking about doing a raw shot of some target
> (lit by a 5000k light), and then maybe converting it
> to TIFF and use SCARSE (www.scarse.org) or whatever.
> Would that be already sufficient to get good results?
> Or at least beeter than
Hi,
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> I am about releasing a R2400 Cmyk ICC profile created with standard
> materials for usage with Gutenprint/CinePaint(Photoprint?) if thats a
> option.
Very much appreciated by me. Even if I decided not to buy the R2400,
it will still help others.
Thanxs, a very res
Hi,
Frédéric wrote:
> Well, you do not need to assign a profile to your jpeg file; your camera has
> already did the job when converting raw into jpeg, in the sRGB colorspace.
Ok, so I am always reduced to sRGB with JPEG. Well, was thinking
about getting a DSLR anyway (because F8.0 on the fixed
Le lundi 7 août 2006 11:40, Olaf Gellert a écrit :
> I need to assign a profile to the image when I imported it
> from my camera. Right now I am using a Sony F828, mainly
> JPEG format (and RAW only for infrared images until now).
> So I have to get or create an ICC profile for this camera.
> To m
Am 07.08.06, 11:40 +0200 schrieb Olaf Gellert:
> Maybe a bit off topic for this forum: What printer driver
> to use (with Linux)? I am thinking of getting a Canon PIXMA
> Pro 9500 (when it comes out later this year) or an Epson
> R2400... I guess I might have a look at something like
> Gutenprint?
Hi all,
thanks a lot for all your feedack and your answers. I
am impressed. :-)
To sum up this a little bit and ask some follow up questions:
Using GIMP 2.3 devel I can at least process images in a color
managed workflow (and even better with cinepaint, with a
reduced set of funtions for image pr
On Saturday 05 August 2006 19:53, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> same size and shape as BetaRGB. BetaRGB has a gamut that is almost
> twice as large as sRGB (69% of Lab vs. 35% of Lab). So this gives you
Well, this is mathematically true, but not so much in human perception. The
differences are in extr
On Saturday 05 August 2006 10:20, Frédéric wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:33, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> > I am not so sure that images in GIMP are "edited in sRGB colorspace".
>
> You are right: I forgot that Gimp let the user choose working colorspace...
> But as you explain later, Gimp is not
On Saturday 05 August 2006 18:33, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> I am not so sure that images in GIMP are "edited in sRGB colorspace".
You are right: I forgot that Gimp let the user choose working colorspace...
But as you explain later, Gimp is not able to read embedded profiles. So
you have to choose t
On Saturday 05 August 2006 00:19, Frédéric wrote:
> On Saturday 05 August 2006 00:35, Olaf Gellert wrote:
>
> [I'ill try to answer you, according to what I understand about color
> management. I may do some mistakes, so please, wait for a guru answer ;o).
> My answer is an exercise to me. My apolog
On Saturday 05 August 2006 00:35, Olaf Gellert wrote:
[I'ill try to answer you, according to what I understand about color
management. I may do some mistakes, so please, wait for a guru answer ;o).
My answer is an exercise to me. My apologizes if there are mistakes].
> I am working on my photos
Olaf,
all, what you showed in your email, can be done on the commandline. But
most users prefere GUI's for such tasks. Your calibration is a good start.
Why not using a open source GUI application, which supports colour
management:
http://www.behrmann.name/index.php?option=com_weblinks&catid=6
Hi,
just for me to make sure that I understand, what I have
to do to get fotos printed with intended colors:
I am working on my photos (usually with GIMP) on a
calibrated display (NEC2180 + Eye-One). When I edited
a photo to my pleasure, I guess this is what I will
have to do:
- Save the image w
20 matches
Mail list logo
