Re: [Lcms-user] more lcms2 questions

2010-06-21 Thread Marti.Maria
Ups, sorry, didn't see the 2nd question. > LPcmsSEQ is no more present. Did the 'pseq' generation change? Does lcms2 > generate a valid 'pseq' tag for device link profiles? If not how is cmsSEQ Any LP* are gone, because it is difficult to specify "const" on such typedefs. Just use cmsSEQ* a

Re: [Lcms-user] more lcms2 questions

2010-06-21 Thread LittleCMS Support
Hi, > > Why is the cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC gone? Is it equivalent to > > cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE? > > That is what I assumed for GraphicsMagick. It uses the same > enumerated value. Hopefully my guess was correct. Yes, that is. The reason is because in lcms1 all possible optimization was to precal

Re: [Lcms-user] more lcms2 questions

2010-06-20 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote: > Some more questions while porting the Oyranos lcms wrapper... > > Why is the cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC gone? Is it equivalent to > cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE? That is what I assumed for GraphicsMagick. It uses the same enumerated value. Hopefully my guess was

[Lcms-user] more lcms2 questions

2010-06-20 Thread Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Some more questions while porting the Oyranos lcms wrapper... Why is the cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC gone? Is it equivalent to cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE? LPcmsSEQ is no more present. Did the 'pseq' generation change? Does lcms2 generate a valid 'pseq' tag for device link profiles? If not how is cmsSEQ applie