On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, John Cupitt wrote:
>
> It's not so easy for users of lcms to decide whether the installed
> version is thread-safe. And I think lcms.pc needs to know about this
> too: it should add -lpthreads to the library line, and possibly
> -D_REENTRANT to the cflags.
It is certainly usef
ark lcms.pc as thread safe.
Regards
Marti
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Cupitt
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:53 PM
Cc: lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] pthread support in lcms 1.16
On 12/29/06, Marti Ma
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis Solomon
[SteelBytes]
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 3:31 AM
To: lcms-user
Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] pthread support in lcms 1.16
an example off the top of my head why funcs like cmsTakeProductName should
be made thread safe ...
an image processing
On 12/29/06, Marti Maria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And especially if that meant that
> > it is now safe to share cmsHTRANSFORM between threads ?
>
> Yep.
Great! Our project has been waiting on this too.
> conflicts. For the remaining 0,1% you may turn
> on the pthread support by editing lcms
www.SteelBytes.com
- Original Message -
From: "Marti Maria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Cyrille Berger'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] pthread support in lcms 1.16
>
> Hi Cyrille,
>
>&g
On Behalf Of Cyrille Berger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 12:33 PM
To: lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Lcms-user] pthread support in lcms 1.16
I wanted to know if pthread support in lcms 1.16 meant that the
functions in lcms were thread safe ? And especially if that meant that
it is now s
I wanted to know if pthread support in lcms 1.16 meant that the
functions in lcms were thread safe ? And especially if that meant that
it is now safe to share cmsHTRANSFORM between threads ?
--
Cyrille Berger
-
Take Surveys.
