LRP uses syslinux defaultly and im guessing LEAF will continue to do so for
the current future..so
- Original Message -
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:04 PM
Subject: SYSLINUX 1.49 released
> Hi everyone,
>
> I ha
> Unless someone objects, I'm going to request archival of SourceForge
> group_id=776 later this week. If someone wants to use it in the future,
> they can have it unarchived. Everyone should remove any links they have to
> the LRP SF site.
AFAIK, my current site is linuxrouter.sourceforge.net fr
I just tarballed the SF linuxrouter site. You can download it from:
ftp://linuxrouter.sourceforge.net/pub/linuxrouter/
linuxrouter-cvsroot.tar.gz 87 Kb
linuxrouter.tar.gz52307 Kb
I shut down all of the LRP SF sites features, and placed this text in the
description:
This site i
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Rick,
> Thanks. I just tarballed the SF linuxrouter site. You can download it from:
> ftp://linuxrouter.sourceforge.net/pub/linuxrouter/
> linuxrouter-cvsroot.tar.gz
> linuxrouter.tar.gz
Grabbing a copy now.
> Unless you have any objections, I'm going to request archival of
>
Finished.
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Would you upload the source for Eiger to download.sourceforge.net? I was
> unable to release the previous uploads. Note: I changed the name prefix to
> "ELD" from "old".
--
rick -- A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.
ICQ# 1590117 [EMAIL
At 08:42 AM 11/6/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
> > Canned Response
> > ID Title
> > 100167 Linux Router Project
> > Please direct all bug reports for Linux Router Project (LRP) releases to
> > Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
>
>This should point to the LRP-dev list, not D
Pedro Barreto wrote:
> both gifs are a simple crappy logo, but with such a simple logo the layout
> for the site is much easier and flexible.
>
> don't be afraid to say it sucks :)
I like it. It's got just about everything I would like in a logo;
it's definately got everything I can reasonably a
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Thank you! I'll try not to mess up this time.
Don't worry about it...I have the files on my box, so I just
have to put them, which requires next to zero effort. :)
> Please let me know when the uploads are complete.
We're at 30% of the first big file, for a total of 15% comp
At 07:32 AM 11/6/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>I happened to think of this - *.bin is a standard extension for
>MacBinary. Is using this for images such a good idea?
...
I don't know if it's a good idea or not, but it is the standard way to
designate a unix image. I didn't create the name d
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Canned Response
> ID Title
> 100167 Linux Router Project
> Please direct all bug reports for Linux Router Project (LRP) releases to
> Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
This should point to the LRP-dev list, not Dave's email addy.
> --
> Mike Noyes
> [EMAIL PROTE
Mike Noyes wrote:
> Rick,
> Would you upload the source for Eiger to download.sourceforge.net? I was
> unable to release the previous uploads. Note: I changed the name prefix to
> "ELD" from "old".
The upload is started. Ought to be done in a few hours or less.
> --
> Mike Noyes
> [EMAIL PROTECT
[ Bug #119749 ] checking DHCP success in /etc/init.d/network
Resolution: Invalid
Status: Closed
Use a Canned Response: Linux Router Project
Canned Response Used Successfully Modified Bug Bug Update Sent
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf
___
I happened to think of this - *.bin is a standard extension for
MacBinary. Is using this for images such a good idea?
As I have your attention :-) I was thinking a LRP/68k would be
interesting, especially since there is a Debian/68k. However, the
Macintosh-68k version requires booting from a
Corrections below.
At 04:53 AM 11/6/00 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
SF Bug Administration
>https://sourceforge.net/bugs/admin/?group_id=13751
>>Add Bug Categories
>>Add categories of bugs like, 'mail module','gant chart
>>module','interface', etc
>>--- Once you add a bug category, it cannot be delet
At 05:29 AM 11/6/00 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 4 Nov 2000, at 17:11, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > I think we need some way to more clearly identify the system
> > a bug is being reported for.
>
>Agreed!
SF Bug Administration
https://sourceforge.net/bugs/admin/?group_id=13751
>Add Bug Ca
The SF staff cleaned up the Leaf ftp directory on:
ftp://download.sourceforge.net/pub/sourceforge/leaf/
All files are now "Binary Executable" or "Plain Text", and should download
properly. :)
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf
_
On 4 Nov 2000, at 17:11, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Would someone please take a look at this bug report? Thanks.
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=119749&group_id=13751
>
> Where did this come from? I don't recognize the procedure as part
> of the default Materhor
At 02:58 AM 11/6/00 +, Pedro Barreto wrote:
>hi.
>
>both gifs are a simple crappy logo, but with such a simple logo the layout
>for the site is much easier and flexible.
>
>don't be afraid to say it sucks :)
I don't think the smaller version looks sharp enough ... but I *really* like
the lar
At 09:49 AM 11/05/2000 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>Mike,
>I'm glad to see you joined the leaf-devel list. Would you like to be added
>as a developer of LEAF? If so, send me your SF unix name and I'll add you
>to the developers.
>
>--
>Mike Noyes
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/
19 matches
Mail list logo
