Everyone,
The leaf-devel list is now set to member_posting_only=yes.
I'll update the Leaf list FAQ with pertinent information for people with
different From and Reply-To addresses later today.
--
Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/leaf
I'm updating stty (it's been out of date for over a year!) and found
something interesting. Using the old version, you get this:
# stty --version
stty (GNU sh-utils) 1.16
Using the NEW version, you get this:
# ./stty --version
stty (GNU sh-utils) 2.0
Written by David MacKenzie.
Copyright (C)
On 7 Nov 2000, at 7:37, Mike Noyes wrote:
> NOTE: If you want, I can do all of this for you.
That would be great!
I think I understand now. I would have a posting address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and a reading address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) which just happens to be in the
Reply-To: field when I
- Original Message -
From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: SYSLINUX 1.49 released
> On 7 Nov 2000, at 6:29, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
>
> > I'm well aware that this is not a core component of
On 7 Nov 2000, at 7:17, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Since this affects you, I'm running the solution for
> member_posting_only=yes by you.
I appreciate that.
> The mailman-user list came up with this work around for your
> different From and Reply-To addresses.
I would have thought this would have c
On 7 Nov 2000, at 6:29, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
> I'm well aware that this is not a core component of LRP/LEAF
> however one of my major (probably ONLY) gripes about LRP is that the
> packages and support programs are rarely updated.. is this something that
> should change in LEAF? in my opinio
- Original Message -
From: "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: SYSLINUX 1.49 released
> On 6 Nov 2000, at 16:56, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "H. Peter An
David Douthitt wrote:
> > > Changes in 1.49:
>
> > > * SYSLINUX: Default installer binary now compiled against
> > > glibc 2.1. If this is inappropriate for your system and you
> > > still want to use the offical version of SYSLINUX, please
> > > follow the instructions in "distrib.doc" to
On 6 Nov 2000, at 16:56, Kenneth Hadley wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:04 PM
> Subject: SYSLINUX 1.49 released
Sigh. As this was written, I updated Oxygen to use Syslinux 1.48.
Si
