Charles I'm sorry, but would you please chose your favorite. We can vote
for an alternate later. Thanks.
Argh OK, make me actually decide...
I guess I have to go with Mike Noyes' logo:
ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/logo/mhnoyes/tuxnet-leaflogo1.png
which I think works better with
Various scripts like sea-wall, Matthew Grant's scripts, and many
'click the box build a script' type programs. These solutions
can be very easy to use, and configurable (to an extent), but they
quickly run into problems when dealing with arbitrary situations
that were not planned for
x-flowedI doubt this will help the current discussion, but I think it's noteworthy.
There is a new FAQ by Daniel Swan for comp.os.linux.security at:
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/docs/colsfaq.html
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
On 3 Jan 2001, at 16:33, David Douthitt wrote:
I'm thinking about this some...
Thinking on this, the Fence idea makes all the problems we've seen:
you not only have to allow one way but also the other.
The Network Idea simplifies things slightly, but creates the problem
in that the
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
For instance, the following network:
...is a nightmarish FrankenNetwork. Hence EigerStein perhaps? I applaud
you for making it work well. =)
Who said it worked well? :
Works well enough that they're keeping it, neh? =)
I think you
Sounds like CheckPoint's GUI, or even more like Cisco's Network
Configurator (not sure of the name, no one really uses it).
I have to admit I'm pretty ambivalent about changing focus. Firewall
configuration focusses on the router because it is a router. Call it a
packet filter or a firewall or a
x-flowedEveryone,
I just uploaded two new logos based on the tuxnet image.
tuxnet-leaflogo2.png - implements a suggestion from George
tuxnet-leaflogo3.png - implements a suggestion from Charles
Charles, I'm sorry about the hat, but I'm still unable to remember
how to 3-D rotate it.
Hello
Everyone,
I just uploaded two new logos based on the tuxnet image.
tuxnet-leaflogo2.png - implements a suggestion from George
tuxnet-leaflogo3.png - implements a suggestion from Charles
Charles, I'm sorry about the hat, but I'm still unable to remember
how to 3-D rotate it.
Sorry for butting in middle of the conversation; and please let me
know if I make an ASS.. out of myself! :)
Can we abstract these networking terms as follow: IS (Intermediate
System), ES (End System) (OSIism here). And for each IS or ES, it
provides one or more SERVICES. HTTP, FTP,
x-flowedAt 11:14 PM 1/3/01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Wolzak) wrote:
Hello
Everyone,
I just uploaded two new logos based on the tuxnet image.
tuxnet-leaflogo2.png - implements a suggestion from George
tuxnet-leaflogo3.png - implements a suggestion from Charles
Charles, I'm
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:31:01AM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
On 3 Jan 2001, at 2:32, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
[...]
What about things like Mason, which scan typical traffic and
implement rules to match? Problem with Mason is it relies on Perl
(not nice in an embedded context).
Ummm,
On 3 Jan 2001, at 23:38, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Ummm, maybe I am out on my own, but what is wrong with having a bulky
fw-builder app that runs on a full machine to generate a light-weight
fw that can be loaded onto the leaf machine?
What "full machine"? If I'm Mr. Home User with Windows 95,
I didn't realize this till later, but perhaps we have something
useful already. at least *I* do :-)
I'm going to try this out and see just exactly what it does. I'm not
satisified entirely with the "watch the traffic and allow it"
approach to firewalling, but it may be a good quickstart,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:53:52PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
On 3 Jan 2001, at 23:38, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Ummm, maybe I am out on my own, but what is wrong with having a bulky
fw-builder app that runs on a full machine to generate a light-weight
fw that can be loaded onto the leaf
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mike Sensney wrote:
Here is my attempt at restating the problem.
(Steps in holding up a REALLY LARGE Stop Sign)
Not picking on you Mike, but you're the first to step out into the open on
this issue, and the first to do more than hint about the possibility.
Are we looking
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
I just uploaded two new logos based on the tuxnet image.
tuxnet-leaflogo2.png - implements a suggestion from George
Change my vote to this one. Much nicer than my first attempt to Manipulate
Graphics. =)
I looked at Pedro's entry, and while
On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
BTW, since I was in Gimp anyway I created another simple logo.
ftp://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/leaf/logo/mhnoyes/cool-metal_leaf.png
Once we get around to secondary logos, this one gets my vote for a banner
style. Nice work, Mike.
--
George Metz
(Steps in holding up a REALLY LARGE Stop Sign)
Where were you when a took that wrong turn in Alberqueque?!? :
Not picking on you Mike, but you're the first to step out into the open on
this issue, and the first to do more than hint about the possibility.
Are we looking at a rewrite of how
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
...
Pretty much all networking related configuration could be directly generated
from an appropriate functional description of the black box, including
interface setup, proxy-arp, static-NAT, QOS, and anything else that happens
inside the box (I don't want to
Paul Batozech wrote:
Well this is tough as all are quite good, but here goes.
Web Site: Eric's
Logo: For a graphic type I'd say Jack's
Sorry about this Jack, but I just saw Mike's 'cool-metal_leaf.png'and I
gotta change my vote!
And no, I'm note just trying to suck up:)
Paul
20 matches
Mail list logo
