Re: [Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread Ray Olszewski
At 05:14 PM 2/5/01 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >At 03:49 PM 2/5/01 -0800, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... >I was thinking of the "Internet Appliance Workshop" (Feb. 20-21) or the >"Embedded Systems Conference" (April 9-13). Can't make the first one, but I plan to be at the April Conferen

Re: [Leaf-devel] Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread ssrat
On 6 Feb 2001, at 1:34, Mike Noyes wrote: > At 03:49 PM 2/5/01 -0800, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >love to get together, but I'll need a little more notice than that > >conference which begins tomorrow :-) > > Jack, > I was thinking of the "Internet Appliance Workshop" (Feb. 20-21)

Re: [Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 03:49 PM 2/5/01 -0800, Jack Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >love to get together, but I'll need a little more notice than that >conference which begins tomorrow :-) Jack, I was thinking of the "Internet Appliance Workshop" (Feb. 20-21) or the "Embedded Systems Conference" (April 9-13). >O

Re: [Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread Kenneth Hadley
I have no prob joining.just need plenty of notice ;-) -Kenneth Hadley - Original Message - From: "Jack Coates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:49 PM Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences > love to get together, but I'll need a

Re: [Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread Jack Coates
love to get together, but I'll need a little more notice than that conference which begins tomorrow :-) Of course, if the conferences don't work out well there's always the King's Head in Campbell. I'm sure all of us could recommend some sort of similary enjoyable establishment :-) -- Jack Coat

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread ssrat
On 3 Feb 2001, at 18:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:22:02PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled: > > I would suggest the following ideas as part of > > any Open Source product: > > > > * What is your target audience? (a/k/a targeted > > demographic) > > Not only tha

Re: [Leaf-devel] First crack at the XML LRP config

2001-02-05 Thread Anh (Ly) Vuong
Hello Scott, Thanks for the excellent comments. Instead of specifying the rules, I am thinking of just 'describing' whatever the user knows or wants to achieve in his/her specific domain. For example, instead of asking the user to specify the rules, why not let the user specifying the n

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 11:31 AM 2/5/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Mike Sensney scribbled: >we just do a whole lot of testing and provide a log of the output. > >We could even write a script that does much/all of said testing. > >It would just be important to make sure t

[Leaf-devel] Embedded Conferences

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, There are a lot of embedded conferences coming up. I hope you find these links useful. Events of special interest to developers of Linux based embedded applications ... http://www.linuxdevices.com/events/index.html ELC EVENTS CALENDER http://www.embedded-linux.org/events.php3 Ray an

Re: [Leaf-devel] First crack at the XML LRP config

2001-02-05 Thread Anh (Ly) Vuong
Hello Ray, Thank you for the valuable insights. Please allow me to clarify something on the topic of writing rules in XML format. I agreed that if we take on the task of 're-writing' the rules in different format (XML or not); we don't solve anything and still have to face the inherit

Re: [Leaf-devel] initd-dynamic

2001-02-05 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> At 04:47 PM 2/3/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >For whoever was asking about initrd-dynamic, I stuck what Dave C. sent me > >on my website after checking with him. It can be found in the new > >experimental directory of my kernel tree: > >http://lrp.steinkuehler

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread thc
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 09:45:27PM -0800, Mike Sensney scribbled: > BTW, we can always create our own professional association with its own > firewall certification criteria. How about the YAFCA? (Yet Another Firewall > Certifying Association) bwahahahahah! I didn't want to be the crazy fool wh

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread thc
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:59:06PM -0800, Scott C. Best scribbled: > Sounds doable. Now to find an Angel to front the $25k. ;) Egadsnow there's the problem; I can't see sinking $25 into it, when it's just going to put a badge that most have never heard of on a single derivative [possibl

[Leaf-devel] the boot process

2001-02-05 Thread Jack Coates
Hi all, I'm going through the boot process of Oxygen looking for stuff to streamline or discard. I've attached a Gnumeric spreadsheet of what I think is happening, which is clearly somewhat incomplete since I can't find where the scripts in /etc/init.d are running from :-(. Specific questions are

Re: [Leaf-devel] FAQs sec02: Sources and Resources

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 01:12 PM 2/4/01 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mike, > >I figured out how to get my HowTo posted, what fun eh? > >I wasn't sure on what protocol to follow when updating this stuff. I mean >I could have edited it but... >Hmm... I wonder what setting it to Pending would have don

[Leaf-devel] FAQs sec02: Sources and Resources

2001-02-05 Thread Steven Peck
Mike, I figured out how to get my HowTo posted, what fun eh? I wasn't sure on what protocol to follow when updating this stuff. I mean I could have edited it but... Hmm... I wonder what setting it to Pending would have done? So, ther I was poking around the documentation section looking for e

[Leaf-devel] Site Update

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, Mailing Lists I think our lists are working again. Unfortunately, I have no idea when message submitted to the lists during the outage will be posted. I don't think any messages will be lost, but if they are please post them again. Thanks. SourceForge Site Status The SF staff just u

Re: [Leaf-devel] initd-dynamic

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 04:47 PM 2/3/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >For whoever was asking about initrd-dynamic, I stuck what Dave C. sent me >on my website after checking with him. It can be found in the new >experimental directory of my kernel tree: >http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/kern

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 09:45 PM 2/3/01 -0800, Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 01:27 PM 02/03/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote > >>At 12:36 PM 2/3/01 -0800, Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Instead, why not test our "standard" distributions against the list of >>>well know Internet scanning services

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-05 Thread Mike Noyes
At 09:45 PM 2/3/01 -0800, Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 01:27 PM 02/03/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote >>https://sourceforge.net/pm/?group_id=13751 >>Security >>Task ID: 25528 >>Summary: Test releases with NMAP and Nessus > >(Add Saint to this list.) > >I would say that scans by NMAP,

Re: [Leaf-devel] First crack at the XML LRP config

2001-02-05 Thread Tom Eastep
Thus spoke Scott C. Best: > > Ya know...I was thinking about what Ray said, and > reflected a bit on how Matthew Schalit did his rc.pf stuff. > It might be worthwhile for "rule order" if there was a > "type" associated with each rule, and a preface to the > ruleset would indicate which "typ