Re: [Leaf-devel] Mailing list archive

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-27 11:16 -0800 >Mike Noyes, 2001-03-26 06:26 -0800 >>Everyone, >>Our lists are now being archived at the Mail-Archive in addition to >>GeoCrawler. Rick and I will attempt to recreate the older messages in our >>new list archives. > >Everyone, >Three of our lists are now archi

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread David Douthitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:24:02PM -0600, David Douthitt scribbled: > > > Bummer...I now have to change my rsync script again. > > > > Just change your script to contain something like this: > > > > ---snip--- > > LEAF=/home/groups/l/le/leaf > > ---snip--- > > > > ...

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:47:47PM -0500, George Metz scribbled: > BYOLinux is another site that actually is designed for absolute green > folks, but overall it provides better descriptions of what it is you're > doing. Check it out at http://www.byolinux.org/ if you want. Decisions, decisions...

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:24:02PM -0600, David Douthitt scribbled: > > Bummer...I now have to change my rsync script again. > > Just change your script to contain something like this: > > ---snip--- > LEAF=/home/groups/l/le/leaf > ---snip--- > > ...then, whenever it changes, you can just chang

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread David Douthitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:35:48AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled: > > Update: > > Our web site directory is here: > > /home/groups/l/le/leaf > > Bummer...I now have to change my rsync script again. Just change your script to contain something like this: ---snip--- LE

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March2001))

2001-03-28 Thread George Metz
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does it ask you ten trillion questions after installing, like Debian > does? > > That's one thing that stops me from using Debian as my main OS. Nope. It autodetects the correct answers to everything - and does it rather well, actually. > I'm quite

[Leaf-devel] LEAF Tracker Patches

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, I'd like us to start using the SF Tracker to handle package submissions. Comments? Anyone can submit their packages (.lrp) to category (Packages) at: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=13751&atid=313751 Note: I don't know if it's necessary to tarball/zip them before up

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-28 12:43 -0500 >On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:35:48AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled: > > Update: > > Our web site directory is here: > > /home/groups/l/le/leaf > >Bummer...I now have to change my rsync script again. > >Is our dir accessible through something like ~leaf, by >a

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:35:48AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled: > Update: > Our web site directory is here: > /home/groups/l/le/leaf Bummer...I now have to change my rsync script again. Is our dir accessible through something like ~leaf, by any chance? Then I wouldn't have to update it next time

Re: [Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
Mike Noyes, 2001-03-28 08:49 -0800 >Everyone, >SourceForge is moving our directories around. I'll be updating links all >day. :( Update: Our web site directory is here: /home/groups/l/le/leaf I opened a support request to find out if the ftp directory is moving also. see https://sourceforge.net

[Leaf-devel] IMPORTANT SourceForge site update

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, SourceForge is moving our directories around. I'll be updating links all day. :( >(2001-03-27) There is a planned outage for SourceForge shell services, >FTP services and web services which will occur for approximately one >hour starting at 00:01 on 2001-03-28. During this outage, us

Re: [Leaf-devel] Near-term plans & more traveling

2001-03-28 Thread Mike Noyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-28 11:20 -0500 >On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:57:05AM -0600, Charles Steinkuehler scribbled: > > If anyone has ideas about how best to manage making various disk > > images with SourceForge, or wants to volunteer to set up a structure, > > please speak up. > >Mike? Mr. Noye

Re: [Leaf-devel] Near-term plans & more traveling

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:57:05AM -0600, Charles Steinkuehler scribbled: > I'd also like to see work begin on a 2.9.8 based replacement for EigerStein. > This work should be done using the SourceForge resources as much as possible > to promote contributions by multiple developers. I'm not sure t

[Leaf-devel] Near-term plans & more traveling

2001-03-28 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
Well, it looks like my absense from home (and minimal time to work on LRP) will continue for a while. Current plans call for me to be gone for about a week starting April 2, gone for a bit more than a week towards the end of April & first of May, then gone for 2-3 weeks starting mid-May. I'll be

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP] OpenSSH 2.5.2p2 - working .lrp yet?

2001-03-28 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> > In choosing static over dynamic, I've tended to favor dynamic linking > > with common libraries (libtermcap, libncurses, libm, libpcap) and > > static linking with uncommon libraries (libnet, libwrap, libdb). > > Okay...so, how do I choose to static-link those libs? I'm not sure > I know how

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:58:04AM -0600, David Douthitt scribbled: > You might want to consider Elfstone; if I remember correctly it is one > of the few (the only?) distribution which uses Motif instead of some > other window manager. Well, I think that regardless of what distribution I use, I'm

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread David Douthitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here's the list of distributions, mostly non-mainstream, whose > claims caused me to be interested: > http://www.jblinux.net/ > http://www.beehive.nu/ > http://www.rocklinux.org/ > http://www.trustix.net/ > http://tiny.seul.org/ > http://www.ibiblio.org/peanut/ > http:/

Re: [Leaf-devel] script problems with grep solved

2001-03-28 Thread David Douthitt
Eric Wolzak wrote: > running eigerstein 2 beta/pppoe/new Busybox(0.49) Um - new busybox is 0.50. > The decision to start psentry $opt based on > > ps ax| grep $prg -$opt| grep "?" |grep "S" > > If the programm was found and sleeping then don't start. > So what happened if $prg -$opt did not

Re: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread David Douthitt
Jack Coates wrote: > now now, let's all play nice before someone gets an eye put out. Agreed! > For comparision my home desktop is a K6-2/400 with 128 MB. Subjectively > twice as fast -- granted I'm using a different application set, but Star > Office is usable (can't say that about the P200 I

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (Marc h 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:38:02AM -0500, George Metz scribbled: > tweaking to go to server mode. On the other hand, it clears the biggest > hurdle I've always had with Debian - getting the damned thing to install > cleanly. =) If you like clean installs, you really ought to try Slackware. ;) >

Re: [OT] RE: [Leaf-devel] bitwar (was New release of Oxygen (March 2001))

2001-03-28 Thread thc
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:51:59AM -0500, George Metz scribbled: > I strongly recommend, if you have the bandwidth and a CD burner, that you > download and try Progeny Debian (ftp or http at archive.progeny.com) for a > go. It's based off of a fairly recent snapshot of Woody, and while > somewhat

[Leaf-devel] script problems with grep solved

2001-03-28 Thread Eric Wolzak
Hello all running eigerstein 2 beta/pppoe/new Busybox(0.49) I encountered the problem that my psentry script during bootup was only partly started, one time the psentry -stcp started the other time only psentry -udp mostly neither :( By starting it from the commandline with /etc/init.d/psentry