On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> That wouldn't take that much. I've recompiled almost everything at
> least once. Next step is to create a LRP directory which contains
> everything, including options used to compile, etc. Then a diff file
> would be created, so that a generic packag
Andrew Hoying wrote:
> We could develop a nice xml/xslt interface to it all that would be easy to
> parse, sort and categorize. It makes a lot of sense, but would require
> updating a lot of old packages to include the .desc file.
That wouldn't take that much. I've recompiled almost everything
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > I suggested (earlier) that we use a .desc file with tags. It could
> > contain all SORTS of things, and becomes extensible in a scary sort of
> > way. All sorts of descriptions could be in there:
> >
> > * version
> > * full package name
> > * pac
Dale Long wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > What do you think of using lua for writing /linuxrc? Anyone here have
> > experience in lua?
>
> I like lua and am currently learning it. It has advantages that it is a
> clean syntax, good for configuration files and configur
Jack Coates wrote:
> Now that would rock :-) especially if one could simply snarf/apkg the
> packages into place from sourceforge.net. Major potential for security
> risk, but there are ways to work it out.
Couldn't one use scp to copy from SourceForge to the local LEAF box?
Might require full
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> I suggested (earlier) that we use a .desc file with tags. It could
> contain all SORTS of things, and becomes extensible in a scary sort of
> way. All sorts of descriptions could be in there:
>
> * version
> * full package name
> * packager
> * compi
David Douthitt wrote:
>
> I was pondering this, wondering if there was another language other than
> /bin/ash which had more power in less space. This is what I've found:
>
> ash 100k
> lua 79k
> What do you think of using lua for writing /linuxrc? Anyone here have
> experience in l
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> I was pondering this, wondering if there was another language other than
> /bin/ash which had more power in less space. This is what I've found:
>
> ash 100k
> rc -- requires libncurses, libreadline
> esh -- requires libreadline, libtermc
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Dale Long wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > Perhaps LEAF can adopt the Debian classification system (free and
> > non-free, etc.) and classify packages that way?
>
> I would be interested in seeing an LRP package repositry, similar to say
> CPAN in forma
Dale Long wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > Perhaps LEAF can adopt the Debian classification system (free and
> > non-free, etc.) and classify packages that way?
>
> I would be interested in seeing an LRP package repositry, similar to say
> CPAN in format, with version in
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> Perhaps LEAF can adopt the Debian classification system (free and
> non-free, etc.) and classify packages that way?
I would be interested in seeing an LRP package repositry, similar to say
CPAN in format, with version information and so on. At the momm
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> With the addition of tcpserver and tcprules to the ever growing list of
> packages, I went and looked at their licensing (always of interest). I
> was dismayed to find out it was under the same licensing as the other
> djb tools (I didn't realize that
When I do IP aliasing, I can simply type:
ip addr add x.x.x.x/x brd x.x.x.x scope global dev ethx
If you want to name it, like eth0:0 then you do:
ip addr add x.x.x.x/x brd x.x.x.x scope global label ethx:x dev ethx
If it is the first ip address it sets it up as primary, the second and so
one
When I do IP aliasing, I can simply type:
ip addr add x.x.x.x/x brd x.x.x.x scope global dev ethx
If you want to name it, like eth0:0 then you do:
ip addr add x.x.x.x/x brd x.x.x.x scope global label ethx:x dev ethx
If it is the first ip address it sets it up as primary, the second and so
one
I can't believe I'm not finding this I thought someone had
mentioned how to do it.
I thought I did it, but it didn't work.
All I want to do is add a new IP address to an existing interface, and
then use the knowledge of how to do it to incorporate it easily into
/etc/network.conf and /etc/i
Andrew Hoying wrote:
>
> David Douthitt wrote:
> > LEAF, in my mind, consists of two distributions - or at least, sponsors
> > them - Eigerstein and Oxygen.
>
> I agree, but both have the same foundation, so I think of them more like sub
> distributions, like how Mandrakesoft has the standard M
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Andrew Hoying wrote:
> David Douthitt wrote:
>
> > Andrew Hoying wrote:
[...]
> > Using vfat instead of msdos is another possibility... for longer
> > filenames.
>
> I'm a big proponent of moving to VFat, we'll just have to find a new small
> boot loader.
We do? Why not
I was pondering this, wondering if there was another language other than
/bin/ash which had more power in less space. This is what I've found:
ash 100k
rc -- requires libncurses, libreadline
esh -- requires libreadline, libtermcap
eforth 12k (static)
lua 79k
es -- won't
Not really news, but I uploaded a basic site to
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/wolffang with links to my various packages
and their home pages, as well as more in depth directions on upgrading to
kernel 2.4.5.
Andrew Hoying
___
Leaf-devel mailing l
David Douthitt wrote:
> Andrew Hoying wrote:
> >
> > I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF
project's
> > various LRP variants are technically a distribution.
>
> LEAF, in my mind, consists of two distributions - or at least, sponsors
> them - Eigerstein and Oxygen.
I
Andrew Hoying wrote:
>
> I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF project's
> various LRP variants are technically a distribution.
LEAF, in my mind, consists of two distributions - or at least, sponsors
them - Eigerstein and Oxygen.
> However as more people begin using
John Ridout wrote:
>
> You had it easy.
> I used to load programs from audio cassettes with my ZX81.
> I was a power user though, I had a 16k RAM pack.
Bah. That Apple II (6MHz CP/M coprocessor, 4Mhz accelerated Apple CPU)
came in later years. I remember loading Applesoft in 48K RAM via
casset
Everyone,
Are we now using our patch manager for all package submissions regardless
of who creates them? Or, are we still only requiring contributors to use
the patch manager?
I can see benefits either way, so I'm just asking for clarification. Thanks.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://
Now available at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/wolffang/kernel_2.4.5 is
my compiled and tested 2.4.5 kernel.
>From the readme file I placed there:
--
This directory contains everything you'll need to get started with kernel
2.4.5 under the Oxygen May 2001 release.
Files:
kern24x.lrp - This
Patches item #442127, was opened at 2001-07-17 12:22
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=313751&aid=442127&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Douthitt (ddouthitt)
Assigned to: Nobod
Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> Andrew Hoying, 2001-07-17 08:36 -0600
> >I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF
> >project's various LRP variants are technically a distribution. We don't,
> >however, have anyone at the present time auditing the variety of packages
> >now availabl
Le Mardi 17 Juillet 2001 16:18, vous avez écrit :
> David:
>
> Ug. DJB is a bright guy, and I'm a big fan of qmail,
> but...he's apparently at war with RedHat (and other major
> distro's) who I guess have slighted him by not incorporating
> his stuff into their releases under his terms.
>
Hello,
I am a developer for the LEAF project at http://leaf.sourceforge.net. We are
currently expanding the packages available for LEAF and would like to
include the ucspi-tcp tools as part of that. However we recognize that your
license does not permit us to distribute these tools in binary form
> Has anyone contacted DJB? He may be willing to make an exception for the
> LEAF project, or even create packages himself.
E-mails I sent regarding his licensing for djbdns went unanswered.
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
__
Andrew Hoying, 2001-07-17 08:36 -0600
>I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF
>project's various LRP variants are technically a distribution. We don't,
>however, have anyone at the present time auditing the variety of packages
>now available for LRP variants from a va
I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF project's
various LRP variants are technically a distribution. We don't, however, have
anyone at the present time auditing the variety of packages now available
for LRP variants from a variety of sources on the web. Perhaps we need
David:
Ug. DJB is a bright guy, and I'm a big fan of qmail,
but...he's apparently at war with RedHat (and other major
distro's) who I guess have slighted him by not incorporating
his stuff into their releases under his terms.
From what I could pull out of his FAQ page for
"distr
With the addition of tcpserver and tcprules to the ever growing list of
packages, I went and looked at their licensing (always of interest). I
was dismayed to find out it was under the same licensing as the other
djb tools (I didn't realize that these were one of them).
According to his page htt
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, John Ridout wrote:
> You had it easy.
> I used to load programs from audio cassettes with my ZX81.
> I was a power user though, I had a 16k RAM pack.
Some of the most fantastic crashes I have seen with those or overheating
ULA's. :-) The old wobbly RAM pack. :-)
The Spectru
You had it easy.
I used to load programs from audio cassettes with my ZX81.
I was a power user though, I had a 16k RAM pack.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Douthitt
> Sent: 17 July 2001 11:01
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
Matthew Schalit wrote:
>
> Ray Olszewski wrote:
> >
> > At 08:37 AM 7/13/01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hilton Travis wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Are those the 8" floppy disks?
> > >
> > >I think the 8" floppy disks never held more than
36 matches
Mail list logo
