> I compiled busybox with uClibc and it was quite easy - especially > since busybox was designed for it. > > Then I compiled fget with dietlibc; also easy and for the same > reasons. However, uClibc seemed more robust and professional and > easier to use. > > Then I tried compiling snarf statically against uClibc. Snarf was not > designed to use uClibc but it was still painless. > > Basically, uClibc gives you a new gcc compiler with everything set the > right way. It really is easy.
For those who might be interested, there's an article about using newlib in the latest Embedded Systems Programming magazine: http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20011220S0058 Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
