Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 21:44 schrieb Jacques Nilo:
> 7/ Moving to glibc 2.1 of 2.2 definitively needs stripping
> libraries. KPK proposed a couple of weeks ago an interesting
> approach:
> http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/min
>ilibc /
Ok, I've "proposed" that
S:
Thanks for your patience with me on this. :)
> > > In a typical setup, no sensitive information is stored on the firewall
> > > machine (or gateway, as we call it), so I'm afraid I don't understand
> > > your question.
> >
> > My impression was that the NoCatAuth process verifi
Hi,
as i write this, i am putting my sources up to devel/arneb on
sourceforge/leaf. Note that this is not complete, it does not build a real
working root.lrp yet, but as people might be interested...
To have a look at it:
install uClibc on youre machine (version 0.9.8 is in the orig-src archive),
"Scott C. Best" wrote:
>
> > In a typical setup, no sensitive information is stored on the firewall
> > machine (or gateway, as we call it), so I'm afraid I don't understand
> > your question.
>
> My impression was that the NoCatAuth process verified this
> login-password-MAC thing, and
Clarifying...
> > 1. What were your design considerations in regards to putting the
> >authorization info and server on the firewall itself? The
> >alternatives are harder, but strike me as possibly more secure
> >than putting such important stuff on boxes whose physical
> >
"Scott C. Best" wrote:
>
> 1. What were your design considerations in regards to putting the
>authorization info and server on the firewall itself? The
>alternatives are harder, but strike me as possibly more secure
>than putting such important stuff on boxes whose physical
>secur
David Douthitt wrote:
>
> All this talk of this "ticker" program - is there any real need for
> even a 3k program to twirl the cursor on a firewall?
That was funny. What I do, if I really want
to give the user some feedback is built in a
series if dots ...
one for each statemen
Hi David
> All this talk of this "ticker" program - is there any real need for
> even a 3k program to twirl the cursor on a firewall?
I agree with that, i prefer to use that amount of memory to your
beep.lrp :).
> I think this was one of the few programs that I outright got rid of
> when I con
All this talk of this "ticker" program - is there any real need for
even a 3k program to twirl the cursor on a firewall?
I think this was one of the few programs that I outright got rid of
when I configured Oxygen in the beginning...
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Unixware, L
