On 2/16/02 at 6:20 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At 2002-02-16 05:42 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >At 2002-02-16 07:25 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> >>On 2/15/02 at 10:15 PM, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Perhaps what we NEED is a test suite - a sort of
> >> >
> Neat but does the 1U have a real 64 bit PCI data bus, not the usual
32-bit
> one, and does the 29160 plug into a 64-bit, extra-long, pci-slot proving
that
> it's a 64-bit setup? I've tried shopping for 64-bit mainboards, and the
> market is a bit thin these days. It's pretty sad seeing my fl
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> > I hate to be a bit lazy, but lacking all the fancy Linux
> > distro's, I was wondering if somebody could distill the
> > essential commands needed to grab everything in bulk data
> > format so that I'd just have a few .tgz files or something.
> > Sort of like:
>
> It's a sort of controlled chaos that benefits all. Developers are able to
> share and propose ideas. Look at each others code. Lead developers no
> longer have to write all of their documentation, maintain web sites, or
> answer all of their own support requests. Users are able browse a single
>
> I hate to be a bit lazy, but lacking all the fancy Linux
> distro's, I was wondering if somebody could distill the
> essential commands needed to grab everything in bulk data
> format so that I'd just have a few .tgz files or something.
> Sort of like:
>
> 1) SF provides nightly tarballs of
At 2002-02-15 15:44 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
>I hate to be a bit lazy, but lacking all the fancy Linux
>distro's, I was wondering if somebody could distill the
>essential commands needed to grab everything in bulk data
>format so that I'd just have a few .tgz files or something.
>Sort of like:
>
David,
I should know better than to post this early in the morning. I didn't
express myself well. See in-line comments below for an explanation. Sorry. :-(
At 2002-02-16 05:42 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
>At 2002-02-16 07:25 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>>On 2/15/02 at 10:15 PM, David Douthitt <[EM
At 2002-02-16 07:25 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>On 2/15/02 at 10:15 PM, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps what we NEED is a test suite - a sort of
> > minimalist "autoconf" which details what works and what
> > doesn't...
>
>Like this:
>
>Checking for busybox date no
>C
On 2/15/02 at 10:15 PM, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps what we NEED is a test suite - a sort of
> minimalist "autoconf" which details what works and what
> doesn't...
Like this:
Checking for busybox date no
Checking for busybox install no
Checking for ip... yes
Chec
On 2/16/02 at 4:42 AM, Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Will you commit this new tree to src/oxygen or bin/oxygen?
> It sounds to me like it should go in src/oxygen.
Me too. Probably into src/oxygen/base ...
--
David Douthitt
UNIX Systems Administrator
HP-UX, Unixware, Linux
[EMAIL PROTE
At 2002-02-15 21:37 -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
>What it comes down to is the following FreeBSD entities:
>
>* making packages (*.lrp)
>* ports
>* source code for the system
>
>I've started creating a directory tree - in preparation for putting
>it into CVS - a tree that contains configurations,
11 matches
Mail list logo
