Adding water to a boiling and already full kettle...
Why can't we use a concept similar to this:
vfat is used
Package name: pppd-2.1.4
Package files: pppd-2.1.4-bin.lrp, pppd-2.1.4-conf.lrp
pppd-bin.lrp contains all necessary binaries and 'non-editable' scripts,
pppd-conf.lrp contains all co
> Adding water to a boiling and already full kettle...
>
> Why can't we use a concept similar to this:
>
>
> vfat is used
>
>
> Package name: pppd-2.1.4
> Package files: pppd-2.1.4-bin.lrp, pppd-2.1.4-conf.lrp
>
> pppd-bin.lrp contains all necessary binaries and 'non-editable' scripts,
> pppd-co
>
>-Original Message-
>From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:39 AM
>To: LEAF Development
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: Standards and due process :-)
>
[snip]
>
>It sounds almost like you want a "minimal set" of enumerated binaries and
>functions
At 2002-02-28 10:51 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
>All of your concerns are well-founded and I approve of this line
>of consideration. However, when considering the wide availability
>of download mirrors and the format restrictions binding each of them,
>a different line of consideration will likely be
At 2002-02-28 10:51 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
>On Thursday 28 February 2002 08:29, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > Lynn,
> > Your description above closely resembles what SF calls a Foundry. I
> > believe we are more than that. In your opinion, are we a "Linux
> > Embedded Appliance Foundry", or are we a p
It seems my day is being rearranged for me :-)
>
>Message: 7
>From: "Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: LEAF Development <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Re: Standards and due process :-)
>Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 11:36:13 -
>
>Adding water to a boiling and already full kettl
Correcting subject line. Done :)
I honestly cannot express myself in very fluently in English.
Therefore, you will have to bear with me for a while. Try to
rearrange my sentences so that they make some sense.
Comments below start with
[snip]
>Adding water to a boiling and already full
Well, I guess I never did properly introduce myself...
I'm currently working as a developper for a Portuguese Institute, preparing
a
Windows NT 4 Unattended Installation that provides for a fully working
workstation for front and backoffice users.
I have been in contact on and off with Linux for
> >It sounds almost like you want a "minimal set" of enumerated binaries and
> >functions, and then Oxygen would add set X and Dachstein would add set Y.
>
> Nope. No. Nein. Niet. Non. :-)
>
> There is NO baseline.
>
> There is one standard: the formation of a package.
>
> The final decision on a
Support Requests item #524646, was opened at 2002-03-01 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=524646&group_id=13751
Category: Dachstein
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
> > >It sounds almost like you want a "minimal set" of enumerated binaries and
> > >functions, and then Oxygen would add set X and Dachstein would add set Y.
> >
> > Nope. No. Nein. Niet. Non. :-)
> >
> > There is NO baseline.
> >
> > There is one standard: the form
11 matches
Mail list logo
