On Wednesday 20 March 2002 17:23, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Dang! There goes my alpha version of LEAF...I guess I'll just have
> to keep my resident Alpha systems running RedHat 7.1 busy crunching
> seti@home work-units (I've got 5 DEC Personal Workstation 500a's,
> three actually running).
> I investigated libc 2.2 when it first came out and all pointers to the
> bloat was support for both 32-bit and 64-bit processors. If you could
> drop the 64-bit support out of the source you would likely reduce a
> huge amount of compiled code (this may be a config option).
> I could be on crack
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 15:40, Simon Blake wrote:
> I have a vague memory of somebody explaining to me that that the
> reason that 2.2.x is so much bigger is because it has a bunch of
> backwards compatibility stuff in it to allow binaries linked against
> 2.0.x to continue to work. So if one
Le Mercredi 20 Mars 2002 20:48, KP Kirchdörfer a écrit :
> it's been my understanding that Bering is based on dachstein rc2.
> But AFAIK dachstein rc2 had the modified backup with destination an
> type (ony looked at the CD release). I'm missing that in Bering. My
> fault?
The lrcfg.back.script w
Hi Eric
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:20:53AM -0500, Eric B Kiser said:
> Si,
>
> How big are we talking about? Could you use it in a dual floppy set up?
libc-2.0.7 is 625Kb, and libc-2.2.5 is 1171Kb, so after gzipping you
gain about 250Kb on the size of root.lrp (from memory). So yes, I don't
se
Am Montag, 18. März 2002 22:56 schrieb Jacques Nilo:
> Updated with a 2.4.18 linux kernel & shorewall 1.2.9. Check:
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/article.php?sid=31
Jacques, Eric;
it's been my understanding that Bering is based on dachstein rc2.
But AFAIK dachstein rc2 had the modified backup w
Le Mercredi 20 Mars 2002 16:20, Eric B Kiser a écrit :
>
> I've been using Dachstein with a home grown upgrade to libc v2.2.4
> (simply replacing most of /lib in root.lrp with the files from my debian
> unstable box) - works a charm, and since I'm working of Compact Flash
> the extra bloat isn't a
At 2002-02-08 08:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 17 Mar 02, at 6:01, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > I'm still looking at ways to make a solid-state flash disk for
> > "everyman" that would let you do away with floppies.
>
>Aren't there CompactFlash USB-based "pen readers" that you can
>jus
Yeah, this is what I have been finding out. I had this idea of creating a 2
floppy setup for an instant development environment. Little did I realize...
Thanks for the follow up though.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECT
On 17 Mar 02, at 6:01, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> I like the Power-PC based stuff. If (more like when) the company I'm
> currently working for craters, I'm thinking about designing/building a PPC
> based embedded system that would run LEAF (or some variant).
What about using the Yellow Briq
On 19 Mar 02, at 16:02, Jacques Nilo wrote:
> > I came across David's make.lrp. Assuming that dependencies are in order
> > shouldn't I be able to just load this package into Bering and be able to use
> > it as a development station. Any insight on this would be appreciated.
> If make.lrp was co
Si,
How big are we talking about? Could you use it in a dual floppy set up?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Blake
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Upgrading Bering to libc 2.2.x
--- Jacques Nilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Next contributions under preparation:
> 3/ PPoE configuration (Eric)
I anxiously await! :-)
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
At 2002-03-19 18:36 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
>Mike Noyes wrote:
>>Everyone,
>>It was recently mentioned to me, that I may not have been eating enough
>>of my own dog food lately. To rectify this situation, I'm soliciting
>>ideas for streamlining our web site navigation.
>
>Heh heh. You mentio
14 matches
Mail list logo
