Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread Paul Traina
Cool. I'm heading out to the desert for 2 weeks, I'll check back in once I have come home and washed all the dust off and regained my sanity. Paul - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Paul; Am Samstag, 19. August 2006 19:01 schrieb Paul Traina: > Your call, but the stuff in the help file isn't formalized and it isn't > validated in any way since it was always human input. The help stuff is as formal as a .depend would be, the first is generated from buildtool.cfg, the latt

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread Paul Traina
Your call, but the stuff in the help file isn't formalized and it isn't validated in any way since it was always human input. When are you guys shooting for a 3.0 alpha test release? I just whacked together stuff for burning man based on 2.4.2 even though that's a bit creaky because I wasn't s

Re: [leaf-devel] Announce: Comprehensive Source Database makes Distributor's and Sysop's life easier

2006-08-19 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: Hi, > Sounds interesting, but the CSDB Web Site has either been set > up for spam or has been spammed quite heavily. that kind of vandalism you have to live with if you're running an public wiki :( I've just restored it. cu -- -

Re: [leaf-devel] Announce: Comprehensive Source Database makes Distributor's and Sysop's life easier

2006-08-19 Thread David Douthitt
Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Announcing the Comprehensive Source Database Project > -- > > ==> What's it all about ? > > The CSDB project provides an uniform database with dozens of > packages, their releases and tarball locations. Using this > data

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, >Eric & KP, > >Looks nice, been trying to catch up on things... > >Couple of questions, while we're doing the 3.0 flag day, would it be OK >if we made the package dependancies explicit, not part of the help file? > That would be a good idea. > >The dependencies should theoretically be r

[leaf-devel] bristuff (asterisk) lrp package available for testing

2006-08-19 Thread Andrea Fino
Hi all, I have prepared a first working version of a bristuff package, based on bristuff-0.2.0-RC8r.tar.gz. Bristuff (from http://www.junghanns.net/en/home.html) is a version of asterisk ( http://www.asterisk.org ) with an isdn stack and drivers for adapter based on the hfc chipset. Here is th

Re: [leaf-devel] new config/backup system

2006-08-19 Thread Paul Traina
Eric & KP, Looks nice, been trying to catch up on things... Couple of questions, while we're doing the 3.0 flag day, would it be OK if we made the package dependancies explicit, not part of the help file? /var/lib/apkg/.depend which would contain a list of packages that the current package depe