Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-05-13 Thread Mike Noyes
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 09:13 -0700, Paul Rogers wrote: > > The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a runnable _and_ useful floppy > > version in the way we provided it with the kernel 2.4- based versions > > I'm not sure I understand why someone wants a 2.6 kernel to run a > standalone LEAF/Bering firew

Re: [leaf-devel] The UnNamed One

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Rogers
> The 2.6 kernel is that large, that a runnable _and_ useful floppy > version in the way we provided it with the kernel 2.4- based versions I'm not sure I understand why someone wants a 2.6 kernel to run a standalone LEAF/Bering firewall. Can't find an old box and needs the hardware support for a