Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next - kernel 3.2

2012-02-16 Thread Erich Titl
Andrew on 16.02.2012 21:59, Andrew wrote: > I finished reviewing of the kernel config, and updated kernel to current > 3.2.6 > One of modification - to use LZO kernel compression to i486 kernel (it > has faster decompression speed, but also have worse compression ratio). > IMHO some tens (or hu

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering-uClibc next - kernel 3.2

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
I finished reviewing of the kernel config, and updated kernel to current 3.2.6 One of modification - to use LZO kernel compression to i486 kernel (it has faster decompression speed, but also have worse compression ratio). IMHO some tens (or hundreds) of KBs on storage isn't too much cost for so

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On 02/16/2012 11:30 AM, Andrew wrote: > Git is enough simple and very powerful system. It may look like too > difficult - but it isn't too hard to understand. Look at commit like a > patch, and on branch like a sequence of patches - it'll be easier to > understand git in that way. http://gitref.or

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

2012-02-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On 02/16/2012 09:24 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: >> Everyone, >> I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated >> CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and >> disabled CVS. >> >> Revision *1.4* - (*sh

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 21:22, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am 16.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Andrew: >> 16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Hi Andrew; hi all > > just to understand how we use git. > > I saw

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Andrew: > 16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: >>> 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >>

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: >> 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Hi Andrew; hi all >>> >>> just to understand how we use git. >>> >>> I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >>> So will there be two "next" branches in the

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: > 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Hi Andrew; hi all >> >> just to understand how we use git. >> >> I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >> So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will >> one(next-experimental) rep

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Hi Andrew; hi all > > just to understand how we use git. > > I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. > So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will > one(next-experimental) replace the other(next)? And if so shouldn't we >

[leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will one(next-experimental) replace the other(next)? And if so shouldn't we remove the old one, just one get not confused? kp --

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated > CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and > disabled CVS. > > Revision *1.4* - (*show annotations* >