Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Folks I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to just _guess_ if it looks OK mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf.new/bering-uclibc git branch maint master * nameif

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Yves on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Folks I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to just _guess_ if it looks OK mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf.new/bering-uclibc

Re: [leaf-devel] Multi-WAN

2012-10-06 Thread Mike Noyes
On 10/05/2012 09:32 PM, Andrew wrote: On 05/10/12 17:14, Mike Noyes wrote: Everyone, Is Bering-uClibc capable of Multi-WAN like: Peplink - Dual-WAN, Multi-WAN Internet Link Load Balancing Routers http://www.peplink.com/ -or- Cisco RV Series Multi-WAN VPN Router

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 6 oct. 2012 à 14:22, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Yves on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Folks I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to just _guess_ if it looks

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Erich this is for example some of the whitespace errors you have in your patches: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/112112/Screenshots/0zl_w0uz~4l7.png Also before merging a topic branch into an integration branch it's better to squash several commits into one or two. Your nameif integration take 4

[leaf-devel] Question about the kernel

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Hi all, just for my information, why do we use the 3.2 kernel for BuC ? Why not using the 3.4 or 3.5 stable versions ? Or the upcoming 3.6 branch that will have good optimizations for network like TCP Small Queues or TCP Fast Open ? Regards, Yves

Re: [leaf-devel] Question about the kernel

2012-10-06 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 06.10.2012 19:02, schrieb Yves Blusseau: Hi all, just for my information, why do we use the 3.2 kernel for BuC ? Why not using the 3.4 or 3.5 stable versions ? Or the upcoming 3.6 branch that will have good optimizations for network like TCP Small Queues or TCP Fast Open ? Hello

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
Yves thanks for your answer on 06.10.2012 18:12, Yves Blusseau wrote: Le 6 oct. 2012 à 14:22, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Yves on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: :$ Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : Hi Folks I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff.

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
on 06.10.2012 18:27, Yves Blusseau wrote: Erich this is for example some of the whitespace errors you have in your patches: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/112112/Screenshots/0zl_w0uz~4l7.png Nice, but why would GIT care. Also before merging a topic branch into an integration branch it's better