Re: [leaf-devel] Question about the kernel

2012-10-06 Thread Andrew
On 06/10/12 23:05, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am 06.10.2012 19:02, schrieb Yves Blusseau: >> Hi all, >> >> just for my information, why do we use the 3.2 kernel for BuC ? >> >> Why not using the 3.4 or 3.5 stable versions ? >> Or the upcoming 3.6 branch that will have good optimizations for network

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
on 06.10.2012 18:27, Yves Blusseau wrote: > Erich this is for example some of the whitespace errors you have in your > patches: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/112112/Screenshots/0zl_w0uz~4l7.png Nice, but why would GIT care. > > Also before merging a topic branch into an integration branch it's bett

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
Yves thanks for your answer on 06.10.2012 18:12, Yves Blusseau wrote: > > Le 6 oct. 2012 à 14:22, Erich Titl a écrit : > >> Hi Yves >> >> on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: >>>:$ >>> Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : >>> Hi Folks I have gotten at a point where

Re: [leaf-devel] Question about the kernel

2012-10-06 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 06.10.2012 19:02, schrieb Yves Blusseau: > Hi all, > > just for my information, why do we use the 3.2 kernel for BuC ? > > Why not using the 3.4 or 3.5 stable versions ? > Or the upcoming 3.6 branch that will have good optimizations for network like > TCP Small Queues or TCP Fast Open ? Hell

[leaf-devel] Question about the kernel

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Hi all, just for my information, why do we use the 3.2 kernel for BuC ? Why not using the 3.4 or 3.5 stable versions ? Or the upcoming 3.6 branch that will have good optimizations for network like TCP Small Queues or TCP Fast Open ? Regards, Yves

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Erich this is for example some of the whitespace errors you have in your patches: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/112112/Screenshots/0zl_w0uz~4l7.png Also before merging a topic branch into an integration branch it's better to squash several commits into one or two. Your nameif integration take 4 commit

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 6 oct. 2012 à 14:22, Erich Titl a écrit : > Hi Yves > > on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: >> >> Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : >> >>> Hi Folks >>> >>> I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. >>> >>> @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to ju

Re: [leaf-devel] Multi-WAN

2012-10-06 Thread Mike Noyes
On 10/05/2012 09:32 PM, Andrew wrote: > On 05/10/12 17:14, Mike Noyes wrote: >> Everyone, >> Is Bering-uClibc capable of Multi-WAN like: >> >> Peplink - Dual-WAN, Multi-WAN Internet Link Load Balancing Routers >> http://www.peplink.com/ >> -or- >> Cisco RV Series Multi-WAN VPN Router >> http://www.

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Yves on 06.10.2012 10:07, Yves Blusseau wrote: > > Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : > >> Hi Folks >> >> I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. >> >> @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to just _guess_ if it >> looks OK >> >> mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf.

Re: [leaf-devel] BuC 4.3 interface naming

2012-10-06 Thread Yves Blusseau
Le 5 oct. 2012 à 19:07, Erich Titl a écrit : > Hi Folks > > I have gotten at a point where I want to push my stuff. > > @Yves could you have a look at my merge output to just _guess_ if it > looks OK > > mega@luna:~/leaf/devel/leaf.new/bering-uclibc> git branch > maint > master > * nameif >