Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-11 Thread David Nicol
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > oops - sorry > > > Hi Nicol, > make that "Hi David" I wasn't trying to make any point; just sharing my experiences that (1) tinygentoo image was easy to work with for creating uclibc-linked this and that (2) with a 2.6 you

Re: [leaf-devel] Bering uClibc with Kernel 2.6

2008-03-10 Thread David Nicol
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a little depressing. After spending years (and tons of emails) > discussing the need for a kernel 2.6 version of LEAF, there has been no > response on this list on the topic. Is somebody actually interes

[leaf-devel] uclibc 0.9.28 gcc.lrp?

2008-02-18 Thread David Nicol
the rootfs image from uclibc.org uses 0.9.27, which is not binary compatible with the 0.9.28 in the bering release candidate. Is it possible to wrap a working development environment that is compatible with the release into a gcc.lrp? Or is it that all I have to do after building ulibc 0.9.29 in