On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oops - sorry
>
> > Hi Nicol,
> make that "Hi David"
I wasn't trying to make any point; just sharing my experiences that
(1) tinygentoo image was easy to work with for creating uclibc-linked
this and that (2) with a 2.6 you
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Martin Hejl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a little depressing. After spending years (and tons of emails)
> discussing the need for a kernel 2.6 version of LEAF, there has been no
> response on this list on the topic. Is somebody actually interes
the rootfs image from uclibc.org uses 0.9.27, which is not binary
compatible with the 0.9.28
in the bering release candidate.
Is it possible to wrap a working development environment that is
compatible with the
release into a gcc.lrp?
Or is it that all I have to do after building ulibc 0.9.29 in