On Thu Jul 31, 2003 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote:
> > > Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the LEAF branches, some of the
> > > POSIXness scripts rely on it.
> >
> > Ok, cool. Just figured I'd check now that Dave has made
> > his dramatic exit stage left.
> >
> > -Erik
> >
> Eri
On Thu Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:41PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote:
> >
> > > Question for you In busybox I have an LRP specific
> > > utility I added _years_ ago written by "Dave kill-a-cop
> > > Cinege" called 'dutmp'. Still used or can I kill it?
>
> Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the L
On Mon Apr 29, 2002 at 08:32:32AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> If the committer had run the test suite, they would have
> discovered this problem.
Sigh. The committer would have too, if he had been working on
the development tree instead of trying to get an (alledgedly)
stable release out the door
On Thu Nov 29, 2001 at 11:51:22PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 11/29/01 at 10:11 PM, Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you happen to be using busybox with uClibc?
>
> I looked again, examined sources, and got this new information:
>
> 1.
On Thu Nov 29, 2001 at 11:22:14PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> On 11/29/01 at 10:11 PM, Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you happen to be using busybox with uClibc?
>
> Yes, indeed. Is that the trouble?
Yup. uClibc timezone support is pretty much al
On Thu Nov 29, 2001 at 10:52:52PM -0600, David Douthitt wrote:
> I've been working on a problem with the date/time. Given the
> appropriate /etc/localtime file and /usr/share/zoneinfo tree, GNU
> /bin/date works - but busybox date does not (both 0.60.1 and 0.60.0).
> I don't know why. I updated
