Arne Bernin wrote:
> well, i asked on the list (uClibc) some time ago, about compiling stuff like
> perl or other "greater" programs, and it seemed that some functions are
> still missing, and some might not even not implemented (That's one reason
> why it is smaller). So maybe there is work to d
Arne Bernin wrote:
>What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-)
>
I don't have anthing to add to Pim's post.
>>>but seems to go right into that
>>>direction, and if it supports enough functions/binaries i would vote for that.
>>>It is small and is good supported, although it
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Arne Bernin wrote:
> What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-)
There are not that many programs which use threads. For the couple that
do, porting the essential bits to linuxthreads symantics sounds like not
too hard? Writing a simple wrapper for the 9
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:46:37AM +0200, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
> Arne Bernin wrote:
>
>
> >
> >It is not usable for this right now
> >
> Then can you tell me what needed functionality is missing?
well, i asked on the list (uClibc) some time ago, about compiling stuff like
perl or other "greate
