Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-16 Thread Mike Noyes
At 09:23 AM 1/16/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Maybe these are good questions for the License Forum? David, I found a discussion about GFDL v1.1 on Slashdot. It may answer some of your questions. http://slashdot.org/articles/00/03/14/0941208.shtml -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-16 Thread Mike Noyes
At 09:23 AM 1/16/01 -0600, David Douthitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 16 Jan 2001, at 1:53, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > The Linux Documentation Project uses the GFDL and they release .pdf > > versions of documents. I think as long as you have a transparent > > version available it's ok. Plus, there

Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-16 Thread David Douthitt
> I'd suggest releasing it in the "Files" area under package > "Documentation" and release "Guides". Okay. > Should we update or close task_id=21162 (LEAF Developers Guide)? Sounds like - once I get feedback from you all. In the spirit of the GFDL, I've attached the "Transparent" copy (*.RTF

Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-16 Thread David Douthitt
On 16 Jan 2001, at 1:53, Mike Noyes wrote: > The Linux Documentation Project uses the GFDL and they release .pdf > versions of documents. I think as long as you have a transparent version > available it's ok. Plus, there are numerous pdf2xxx translators available, > and the pdf specification i

Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-15 Thread Mike Noyes
At 04:58 PM 1/15/01 -0600, "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've licensed it under the GNU FDL, and thus it would seem that the >*.RTF ("Transparent") version is required as compared to the *.PDF >(which is called "Opaque"). Not a bad thing, I guess. David, The Linux Documentation Pr

Re: [Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-15 Thread Mike Noyes
At 04:58 PM 1/15/01 -0600, "David Douthitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I some documentation to be released ("Developing for LRP"), but I was >wondering where to put it. It's not something (I think) that would >fit easily into the documentation page, since it is in *.PDF and >*.RTF formats - I wa

[Leaf-devel] Documentation to Release

2001-01-15 Thread David Douthitt
I some documentation to be released ("Developing for LRP"), but I was wondering where to put it. It's not something (I think) that would fit easily into the documentation page, since it is in *.PDF and *.RTF formats - I wanted to be able to control the type formatting..., and some other print