> > Similarly, we could say that the security of lrcfg is the strength
of
> > your root password for the internal interface, and whether you allow
> > inbound telnet or ssh on your external interface. Once the someone
> > gets in as root, I really don't care if he abuses lrcfg - he already
> > o
On Sunday 01 September 2002 09:58, Nathan Angelacos wrote:
> Hey Lynn, thanks for your comments.
>
> I guess we are approaching this from slightly different starting
> assumptions. My assumption is that the webbased configuration engine
> is just a pretty face on lrcfg.
>
> The model I'm thinking
[Leaf-devel] Re: Webbased configuration
> Better sense tells me I should probably keep quiet, but ...
Nah...speak up. We won't even flame you here!
> Back when this discussion came up previously (Dec 2001/Jan 2002?) I
> Better sense tells me I should probably keep quiet, but ...
Nah...speak up. We won't even flame you here!
> Back when this discussion came up previously (Dec 2001/Jan 2002?) I
> was able to get micro_httpd working with an embedded lua interpreter.
> It allows one to write html code with inli
Better sense tells me I should probably keep quiet, but ...
Back when this discussion came up previously (Dec 2001/Jan 2002?) I
was able to get micro_httpd working with an embedded lua interpreter.
It allows one to write html code with inline lua scripting, like php.
To add some real numbers
