Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-03-02 Thread Jack Coates
Hey, I just cleaned out my directory, saving 8M. Everything I do is now primarily on my site, secondarily in CVS. On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Noyes wrote: > Everyone, > I had hoped for some additional time, before we needed to address this > issue, but the situation has changed. We are once again

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Noyes
At 2002-02-27 20:22 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: >Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > Also, note files that are >10MB should not reside on the shell > > server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving > > their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > Also, note files that are >10MB should not reside on the shell > server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving > their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP. Thanks. > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Noyes
At 2002-02-27 11:04 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome. > > > >I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been > > >a while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage > > >quota checks, we noticed that

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
> Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome. > >I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been a > >while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage quota > >checks, we noticed that leaf is once again using a fairly large chunk > >of disk for di

[Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Noyes
Everyone, I had hoped for some additional time, before we needed to address this issue, but the situation has changed. We are once again over our quota on the shell server (ref. forward from Jacob Moorman at the bottom of this message). I'm proposing the following changes to our Individual Deve