Le 30/10/2012 17:36, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
> There has been proposals to update the current 3.2.x kernel. I voted to
> stay with the 3.2 kernel, which is well tested, Andrew voted for a 3.4
> kernel, Yves asked for a more recent one, but also pointed out a few
> weeks, that the 3.4 kernel is al
On 30/10/12 18:36, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi Gents;
>
> After some talks about beta alpha and whatever, I'm lost about what
> should happen next :)
>
> I'll try to summarize and want to make a proposal.
>
> Main points discussed are the kernel, the toolchain, uClibc and an image
> beyond X86-32.
Hi Gents;
After some talks about beta alpha and whatever, I'm lost about what
should happen next :)
I'll try to summarize and want to make a proposal.
Main points discussed are the kernel, the toolchain, uClibc and an image
beyond X86-32.
I think the uClibc version is fixed - especially since u