On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:25 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2011, 18:50:47 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
> > modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
> > which a
03.11.2011 19:50, davidMbrooke пишет:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
> modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
> which are:
> - Not included in the standard Perl distribution
> - Available from CPAN (http://ww
Hi
at 03.11.2011 18:50, davidMbrooke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
> modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
> which are:
>- Not included in the standard Perl distribution
>- Available from CPAN (htt
Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2011, 18:50:47 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
> modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
> which are:
>- Not included in the standard Perl distribution
>- Avail
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
which are:
- Not included in the standard Perl distribution
- Available from CPAN (http://www.cpan.org/)
- Potentially used by several Package
