Re: [leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-08-14 Thread Eric Spakman
Erik, > > I just looked in the POSIXness scripts, the parts were it's used in > > are: "last" and "who", for "who" there already exist a bb applet in > > 1.0.0-pre2, so the only dutmp use seems to be for "last" . > > I just implemented a minimalist 'last' and dropped 'dutmp' > from busybox. Le

Re: [leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-08-09 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jul 31, 2003 at 11:05:30PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote: > > > Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the LEAF branches, some of the > > > POSIXness scripts rely on it. > > > > Ok, cool. Just figured I'd check now that Dave has made > > his dramatic exit stage left. > > > > -Erik > > > Eri

Re: [leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-07-31 Thread Eric Spakman
> > Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the LEAF branches, some of the > > POSIXness scripts rely on it. > > Ok, cool. Just figured I'd check now that Dave has made > his dramatic exit stage left. > > -Erik > Erik, I just looked in the POSIXness scripts, the parts were it's used in are: "

Re: [leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-07-31 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jul 31, 2003 at 10:18:41PM +0200, Eric Spakman wrote: > > > > > Question for you In busybox I have an LRP specific > > > utility I added _years_ ago written by "Dave kill-a-cop > > > Cinege" called 'dutmp'. Still used or can I kill it? > > Yes, dutmp is still used in (all of?) the L

Re: [leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-07-31 Thread Eric Spakman
> > > Question for you In busybox I have an LRP specific > > utility I added _years_ ago written by "Dave kill-a-cop > > Cinege" called 'dutmp'. Still used or can I kill it? > > > > -Erik > > > > -- > > Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ > > --This message was w

[leaf-devel] Busybox "dutmp" ???

2003-07-31 Thread Sean
> -Original Message- > From: Erik Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:20 PM > To: Sean > Subject: Re: LEAF > > > On Wed Jul 30, 2003 at 01:07:56PM -0400, Sean wrote: > > Yes. His "announcement" caused quite a stir on the LEAF > lists. The > > old-t