On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 20:57 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> I do not see a real need to migrate.
>
> The current cvs usage "just works" and I haven't heart complains from users
> that there are any difficulties using cvs. Not to mention performance pb's
> with the few checkouts a week.
a simpl
Hi all,
> -Original Message-
> From: KP Kirchdoerfer [mailto:kap...@users.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:58 PM
> To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?
>
> Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:
Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:09 schrieb Mike Noyes:
> Everyone,
> I think we should migrate to SVN. SVN integrates with Track well, and:
>
> 1. Availability will be better on other services; we
> have a more scalable and resilient infrastructure under them
> 2. Perfo
Everyone,
I think we should migrate to SVN. SVN integrates with Track well, and:
1. Availability will be better on other services; we
have a more scalable and resilient infrastructure under them
2. Performance will be substantially better for any
ops that actually
