Hi Folks
The subject says it all, I could not find the right way to include a
link in a .lrp package, so the file gets created like
SALT# > foo
SALT# ln foo bar
SALT# ls -l
-rw-r--r--2 root root 0 Jan 5 19:33 bar
-rw-r--r--2 root root 0 Jan 5 19:33 foo
Hi.
Look at any library package.
05.01.2016 21:35, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Folks
>
> The subject says it all, I could not find the right way to include a
> link in a .lrp package, so the file gets created like
>
> SALT# > foo
> SALT# ln foo bar
> SALT# ls -l
> -rw-r--r--2 root root
Am 05.01.2016 um 20:48 schrieb Andrew:
> I'm not sure about hardlinks. IMHO they weren't needed earlier so
> there's no hardlinks support. But I didn't look in code.
It's not that important, just knowing about the facts.
cheers
ET
I'm not sure about hardlinks. IMHO they weren't needed earlier so
there's no hardlinks support. But I didn't look in code.
05.01.2016 21:45, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Am 05.01.2016 um 20:37 schrieb Andrew:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Look at any library package.
> Link creates a symlink, not a hard
Hi Andrew
Am 05.01.2016 um 20:37 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
>
> Look at any library package.
Link creates a symlink, not a hard link. Is this not supported?
Thanks
ET
--
___
