Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-28 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 18.12.2011 14:10, schrieb david M brooke: > > On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: >> >> Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN >> support? > Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I > haven't checked). > >> Otherwise

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-18 Thread david M brooke
On 17 Dec 2011, at 18:56, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Does any of the telephony applications (yate, asterisk) do need ISDN > support? Asterisk does not need ISDN and I don't think yate does either (though I haven't checked). > Otherwise it may removed from the kernel. > > kp I think it is OK t

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 17.12.2011 20:39, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > Hi; > > results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls > have a look at > https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1) > > kernel size > linux

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi; results of current status of the kernel review in size (for changes pls have a look at https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Changelog#Changes_between_4.1.1_and_4.2-beta1) kernel size linux-2.6.35.14-geode 1,2MB -> 937kb linux-2.6.35.14-i486 1,3MB ->

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-17 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 11.12.2011 17:06, schrieb Andrew: > Hi all. > I made some changes into kernel config today (I replaced cache allocator > from slab to slob on non-SMP embedded targets - slob seems to have less > resource consumption due to it's simplicity, and is targeted for small > systems); also I enabled

[leaf-devel] Kernel config revision

2011-12-11 Thread Andrew
Hi all. I made some changes into kernel config today (I replaced cache allocator from slab to slob on non-SMP embedded targets - slob seems to have less resource consumption due to it's simplicity, and is targeted for small systems); also I enabled heap randomization (it's recommended value), a