09.08.2012 20:16, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am 05.08.2012 16:21, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
>> Hi Yves;
>>
>> took some time to respond, cause I've updated my router to latest
>> changes, and esp. splitting initrd into initrd and initmod needed some
>> precautions before I lose connection at all (main
Am 05.08.2012 16:21, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
> Hi Yves;
>
> took some time to respond, cause I've updated my router to latest
> changes, and esp. splitting initrd into initrd and initmod needed some
> precautions before I lose connection at all (mainly because I had to
> update syslinux, which wa
Hi Yves;
took some time to respond, cause I've updated my router to latest
changes, and esp. splitting initrd into initrd and initmod needed some
precautions before I lose connection at all (mainly because I had to
update syslinux, which was easy in the end).
Am 02.08.2012 22:23, schrieb Yves Blu
Le 2 août 2012 à 19:01, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
> Am 31.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
>>
>> Le 31 juil. 2012 à 17:35, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Yves;
>>>
>>> I've looked into the links you've send and start to get it. Though I
>>> dislike the graphs that try to explain some
Am 31.07.2012 19:33, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
>
> Le 31 juil. 2012 à 17:35, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
>
>> Hi Yves;
>>
>> I've looked into the links you've send and start to get it. Though I
>> dislike the graphs that try to explain something which is IMHO pretty
>> clear, *once* one understood it
Am 30.07.2012 19:09, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Hi all,
> is it possible to avoid merge workflow to have a linear history of
> commits and avoid the conflicts on the repository ?
> Here are some articles that explain why Merge Workflow is "bad":
> http://www.randyfay.com/node/89
> http://www.randyfa
Le 31 juil. 2012 à 17:35, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
> Hi Yves;
>
> I've looked into the links you've send and start to get it. Though I
> dislike the graphs that try to explain something which is IMHO pretty
> clear, *once* one understood it, and less helpful before. (Not your fault!)
>
> Am 31
Hi Yves;
I've looked into the links you've send and start to get it. Though I
dislike the graphs that try to explain something which is IMHO pretty
clear, *once* one understood it, and less helpful before. (Not your fault!)
Am 31.07.2012 09:36, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Le 30/07/2012 19:46, KP Kir
Le 30/07/2012 19:46, KP Kirchdoerfer a écrit :
> Though a short note about what we have done over the weekend, maybe not
> in the best way.
>
> 4.3 has been tagged and released. A new branch for 4.3-fixes has been
> created. So 4.3 (and 4.x) has put into maintenance mode.
> The next branch has been
Am 30.07.2012 19:09, schrieb Yves Blusseau:
> Hi all,
> is it possible to avoid merge workflow to have a linear history of
> commits and avoid the conflicts on the repository ?
> Here are some articles that explain why Merge Workflow is "bad":
> http://www.randyfay.com/node/89
> http://www.randyfa
Hi all,
is it possible to avoid merge workflow to have a linear history of
commits and avoid the conflicts on the repository ?
Here are some articles that explain why Merge Workflow is "bad":
http://www.randyfay.com/node/89
http://www.randyfay.com/node/91
Also it's preferable to commit only new "
11 matches
Mail list logo