Lynn Avants wrote:
...
It might make it clearer if I simply digress my
IHMO in a simpler manner than before........
The present backend (e3, lrpkg, and lrcfg) are simply not compatible
with the present desires of home users and more experienced users
alike much of the time.
a) can packages end in .leaf?
b) would the new package system depend on a global config-db?
c) or would the new package system include the global config-db at its core?
Thanks,
Matt
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
