[leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Ron Senykoff
Hello all, I just wanted to touch base and let you know I'm starting a cycle to get QBox updated, and will be using Bering-uClibc 3.0. I may actually branch out QBox into 2 'versions.' One will be a regular leaf package that can be installed normally. The other would be that I branch off and

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hello Ron, The nice thing about Bering-uClibc-3.0 is that you don't need to tune the packages but only have to touch the configdb.lrp and moddb.lrp to have a different configuration. An other nice thing is that you can create an lwp web plugin specific for QOS use, given it a specific

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Ron Senykoff
Sorry for the duplicate emails Eric... Instead of branching out, you could create a custom QOS, configdb and moddb package and a lwp plugin. The packages can be merged in an automatic way with the standard package to an image. This way you can just keep pace with Bering-uClibc development without

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Paul Traina
Ron Senykoff wrote: Sorry for the duplicate emails Eric... Instead of branching out, you could create a custom QOS, configdb and moddb package and a lwp plugin. The packages can be merged in an automatic way with the standard package to an image. This way you can just keep pace with

Re: [leaf-devel] QBox - Back under active development

2006-11-29 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Paul, Ron, One of the things I always bitch about here (and unfortunately don't help enough with) is improving on exactly this thing -- the packaging and installation of B-U along with the dev environment. If you feel the same way, it would be totally cool if you would be willing to take