Hi Paul, Ron,
> One of the things I always bitch about here (and unfortunately don't
> help enough with) is improving on exactly this thing -- the packaging and
> installation of B-U along with the dev environment.
>
> If you feel the same way, it would be totally cool if you would be
> willing to
Ron Senykoff wrote:
> Sorry for the duplicate emails Eric...
>
>>> Instead of branching out, you could create a custom QOS, configdb and
>>> moddb package and a lwp plugin. The packages can be merged in an automatic
>>> way with the standard package to an image. This way you can just keep pace
>>>
Sorry for the duplicate emails Eric...
>>Instead of branching out, you could create a custom QOS, configdb and
>>moddb package and a lwp plugin. The packages can be merged in an automatic
>>way with the standard package to an image. This way you can just keep pace
>>with Bering-uClibc development
Hello Ron,
The nice thing about Bering-uClibc-3.0 is that you don't need to tune the
packages but only have to touch the configdb.lrp and moddb.lrp to have a
different configuration.
An other nice thing is that you can create an lwp web plugin specific for
QOS use, given it a specific webinterfac
Hello all,
I just wanted to touch base and let you know I'm starting a cycle to
get QBox updated, and will be using Bering-uClibc 3.0.
I may actually branch out QBox into 2 'versions.' One will be a
regular leaf package that can be installed normally. The other would
be that I branch off and redo
On 3/29/06, Jorn Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Maybe this could be another LEAF branch? Mike - did you not look for a
> new branch?
>
> Ron - is it a LRP package you have trouble with? In case which package is
> it?
I think I've found a solution for the init script problem based on
an
> at /var/webconf/www/lrcfg.cgi under the section "Daemon Status" for how other
> exceptions were handled.
Thanks for the pointer. Handling the exception is a good way to go IMO.
Cheers,
-Ron
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groun
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 00:10, Ron Senykoff wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Working on 2nd version of my qbox project
> http://www.cs.luc.edu/projects/comp412/q-box/
>
> I'm having trouble figuring out how to make lrp treat my init script
> as a script and not a daemon. At the end of running, it says "T
. mars 2006 07:10
To: leaf-devel
Subject: [leaf-devel] QBox... I'm qonfused!
Hello all,
Working on 2nd version of my qbox project
http://www.cs.luc.edu/projects/comp412/q-box/
I'm having trouble figuring out how to make lrp treat my init script
as a script and not a daemon. At the end
Hello all,
Working on 2nd version of my qbox project
http://www.cs.luc.edu/projects/comp412/q-box/
I'm having trouble figuring out how to make lrp treat my init script
as a script and not a daemon. At the end of running, it says "The
command failed. Usually this is due to an error in the configu
Hello all.
As my QBox project, based on LEAF (specifically Bering uClibc) is now
released (and free for download) you think I could get linked from the
LEAF and/or Bering uClibc site?
Here's the URL to check it out:
http://content.cs.luc.edu/projects/comp412/q-box
I'm planning an upcoming releas
11 matches
Mail list logo
