--- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nathan,
> Would you mind making your diff of apkg available?
>
Mike, I put the package as it exists and some description here
http://www.tetrasec.net/index.cgi?page=ApkgLRP
As always, comments, suggestions welcome.
--- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nathan,
> Would you mind making your diff of apkg available?
>
Sure. It doesn't do the http/ftp gets like the real apkg did, and the
include/exclude logic is closer to serge's packetfilter than it is to
standard lrp, so it's a little different fro
On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 09:51, Nathan Angelacos wrote:
> Thanks. Actually I'm using a rewritten apkg (originally from
> Oxygen).
Nathan,
Would you mind making your diff of apkg available?
--
Mike Noyes
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm
--- Charles Steinkuehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The big thing to consider is the fact that .deb packages were not
made
> to re-build the full OS at each reboot, ie: they presume persistent
> storage. If you're running your systems off a HDD, that might not
be a
> problem for you
Nathan Angelacos wrote:
But at that point, I question whether or not its just better to make
the switch and use busybox's dpkg applet - and use the .deb package
format. debian already has the pre-install, install, deinstall
(forget the name) and post-deinstall scripts.
Am I missing something
Note: I am NOT wanting to start another "which package system is best"
discussion, I'm just looking for comments, observations you all may
have...
Having used lrp (original), oxygen, Dachstein, bering, and uClib
bering, I'm very familiar with the .lrp package structure. Currently
we have
