Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Mike Noyes
On 02/16/2012 11:30 AM, Andrew wrote: > Git is enough simple and very powerful system. It may look like too > difficult - but it isn't too hard to understand. Look at commit like a > patch, and on branch like a sequence of patches - it'll be easier to > understand git in that way. http://gitref.or

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 21:22, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am 16.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Andrew: >> 16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Hi Andrew; hi all > > just to understand how we use git. > > I saw

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.02.2012 20:00, schrieb Andrew: > 16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: >>> 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >>

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 20:46, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: >> 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >>> Hi Andrew; hi all >>> >>> just to understand how we use git. >>> >>> I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >>> So will there be two "next" branches in the

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Am 16.02.2012 19:00, schrieb Andrew: > 16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Hi Andrew; hi all >> >> just to understand how we use git. >> >> I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. >> So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will >> one(next-experimental) rep

Re: [leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew
16.02.2012 19:54, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > Hi Andrew; hi all > > just to understand how we use git. > > I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. > So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will > one(next-experimental) replace the other(next)? And if so shouldn't we >

[leaf-devel] git next next-experimental

2012-02-16 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
Hi Andrew; hi all just to understand how we use git. I saw that Andrew merged next with next-experimental. So will there be two "next" branches in the near future, or will one(next-experimental) replace the other(next)? And if so shouldn't we remove the old one, just one get not confused? kp --