Re: [leaf-devel] strongswan.lrp

2015-12-20 Thread Erich Titl
Hi KP Am 20.12.2015 um 15:25 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > Hi Erich; > ... > > Your point adding lwp's to pacjages is not valid in this case - ipsec.lwp > would have been buried in ipsec.lrp; strongswan.lrp is a complete new package. Well, ipsec.lrp was _not_ called openswan.lrp :-) > >

Re: [leaf-devel] strongswan.lrp

2015-12-20 Thread kp kirchdoerfer
Hi Erich; Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015, 12:02:08 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi Folks > > As the old ipsec.lrp has been changed to strongswan.lrp, did anyone > follow up with checking and renaming ipsec.lwp? Remember my suggestion > to include the webconf files in the packages :-) No I didn't. I

[leaf-devel] strongswan.lrp

2015-12-14 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Folks As the old ipsec.lrp has been changed to strongswan.lrp, did anyone follow up with checking and renaming ipsec.lwp? Remember my suggestion to include the webconf files in the packages :-) cheers ET --