Hi!
Kernel modules are NOT dependant of whichever lib you are using.
So, to get your module, just browse through the kernel modules for the
particular kernel you are using.
-Original Message-
From: David Pitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
Bering PPPoE Docs
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bupppoe.html
Original Message-
From: Thomas V. Fischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering: pppoe docs...
Can anyone point me to some detailed doc
Just have a look : http://www.grsecurity.net/
"Due to patent violations with a Trusted Operating
System in development
by AOL/Time Warner, I have been ordered (via a
cease-and-desist letter
from their lawyer, Frederick C. Wilkes) to stop
development on grsecurity
and remove all code relevant to th
Sounds like an April's Fool :)
lol
p.s. but then again it may be true as well...
-Original Message-
From: Bibinsa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] grsecurity
Just have a look : http://www.grsecurity.net/
"D
> Does the freeswan lrp package supports EAS alg ?
>
> I want to use Cisco VPN Client under winXP/2k avec
> Bering running freeswan but freeswan appears not to be
> able to use AEC algo.
On my page at
http://leaf-project.org/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=1402&page_id=49
You can find a kernel, the modu
Eric Spakman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric,
I stand corrected. I didn't know this about uClibC.
Thanks,
Greg Morgan
From: "Markus Koelle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:03:45 +0200
Subject: [leaf-user] timezone in uClibc-Bering 1.1
I need correct CET
--- "Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit : >
>
> Sounds like an April's Fool :)
>
I hope so !!
If not... what should we do with bering ?
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http:
Thanks a lot !
Should I try to use these packages or should I wait
for the new Bering release (do you know when I will be
released ?) ?
PS : AEC is a mistake, I wanted to say AES ;-)
--- Alex Rhomberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
> Does the freeswan lrp package supports EAS alg ?
> >
> > I
Looks like a new Security flag in IPV4 headers will make life much
easier for firewalls:
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosti
Hi,
I get the following pair of messages every 20secs and consequently
filling my logs very quickly:
Mar 31 10:56:07 qctogate pppd[25192]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x36
magic=0x57cb13ef]
Mar 31 10:56:07 qctogate pppd[25192]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x36
magic=0x6deaf984] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
edit ppp options and remove the 'debug' option :)
easy.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:05 PM
To: Leaf-user
Subject: [leaf-user] pppd filling up logs
Hi,
I get the following pair of messages every 20secs and consequently
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 08:16, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
> edit ppp options and remove the 'debug' option :)
>
I was looking at that option but wasn't sure how much of the connect
messages would be ignored if debug was off.
Thanks,
Stephen
---
Thi
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:42:17 +0200 (CEST) Bibinsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
> --- "Luis.F.Correia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
> écrit : >
> >
> > Sounds like an April's Fool :)
> >
> I hope so !!
> If not... what should we do with bering ?
>
If you click on the grsecurity logo, it
After debug is turned off, you will only see in the logs the connect
successfully.
But the info should be enough.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 5:35 PM
To: Leaf-user
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] pppd filling up logs
On Tue, 200
Hey all,
I have set=up tinydns on my bering box and when i do nslookups (or us dnsip)
it doesn't return any address.
Below is my data file. I have set-up tinydns with internal ip of
192.168.51.254, hosting private domain, with declared domains of
home.tvf-prod.com and 51.168.192.in-addr.arpa.
An
And what day is it today:)
> Looks like a new Security flag in IPV4 headers will make life much
> easier for firewalls:
>
> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt
>
> --
> Charles Steinkuehler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Jim TerWee | Our capacity for understanding is
[EMAIL PROTECTED
The day where you must believe in everything you read :)
-Original Message-
From: Jim TerWee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RFC-3514
And what day is it today:)
> Looks like a new Security flag in IPV4 heade
My favorite still has to be RFC1149:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
I've got a point-to-point link working pretty well (except for the
occasional extra delay caused by a nearby park), but I'm still trying to
figure out how to get it to talk to my LEAF system without customized
hardware...se
Hi there,
I'm trying to get Bering 1.1 to work with PPTPD & Windoze box'es however it
seams that the PPTPD.lrp don't support MSCHAP etc Have anyone got this
to work "out of the box" - or would one need to do some patching?
Thanks
Jorn
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Steinkuehler
I have 2 wisp station with Orinoco Gold Cards connected to one Orinoco AP1000, with
the distance about 1Km and 500m from the AP! The communication with the LAN Network
connected to AP1000 is 100%...
But when i try to enter in the LAN Network in the other wisp... the communication goes
terrible,
OK people. Time for a dumb question. How do I do OSPF routing under Bering
1.1?
Best Regards,
Roger McClurg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No
Charles
They should have worded it for IPV6, the likelyhood for believing this
would be a lot higher.
I like the avian carrier method, after each packet received there is fresh
meat for the table and the delay gets a lot higher if you have to breed and
train the carrier.
Erich
Charles Steinku
Hi,
I'm using bering and shorewall (penultimate releases). I have three
interfaces on my device: eth0 eth1 eth2. eth0 is the public interface
to which my ISP has directed a /29 subnet. eth1 and eth2 are two
non-routable subnets (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24), respectively.
I'm stuggli
Hi all,
Few days ago I try to up road-warrior with rsa (Subnet A) on my bering
box. I found that after my client (win2k) is established with my firewall,
when my client want to access my subnet they got messages "request time
out". After I check at my bering box I found that SubnetA using seco
Scott wrote:
Hi,
I'm using bering and shorewall (penultimate releases). I have three
interfaces on my device: eth0 eth1 eth2. eth0 is the public interface
to which my ISP has directed a /29 subnet. eth1 and eth2 are two
non-routable subnets (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24), respectively.
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Scott wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using bering and shorewall (penultimate releases). I have
>> three interfaces on my device: eth0 eth1 eth2. eth0 is the public
>> interface to which my ISP has directed a /29 subnet. eth1 and eth2
>> are two non-routable subnets (192
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 02:36 pm, Jorn Eriksen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to get Bering 1.1 to work with PPTPD & Windoze box'es however it
> seams that the PPTPD.lrp don't support MSCHAP etc Have anyone got this
> to work "out of the box" - or would one need to do some patching?
ms-ch
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 03:21 pm, Roger E McClurg wrote:
> OK people. Time for a dumb question. How do I do OSPF routing under Bering
> 1.1?
Use the "zebra" package:
http://www.eric.kiser.com/download.htm
It seems as if Eric K's /devel directory has been assimulated.
--
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embed
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 09:04 pm, Thitiporn Pornpirunrak wrote:
> Hi all,
> Few days ago I try to up road-warrior with rsa (Subnet A) on my bering
> box. I found that after my client (win2k) is established with my firewall,
> when my client want to access my subnet they got messages "request
Scott,
> I'm stuggling to find a way to host both 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 on eth0,
> and to direct .4 traffic to eth1 and .5 traffic to eth2. I think I know
> what to configure in shorewall, but I'm not sure where to configure the
> second address for eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces (if at all). P
> Few days ago I try to up road-warrior with rsa (Subnet A) on
> my bering
> box. I found that after my client (win2k) is established with my firewall,
> when my client want to access my subnet they got messages "request time
> out". After I check at my bering box I found that SubnetA using se
Hi all,
- [C] a.b.c.d/28 (This
subnet use routing table
T1)
|
| [A] 192.168.11.0/24
(User normally routing table)
32 matches
Mail list logo
