[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5 HDD Version Question

2004-07-20 Thread Chris Lee
Hi, Thanks K.-P. Kirchdorfer suggestion to use latest beta version for OpenVPNZ. I can setup and backup now. :^) Here is some newbie question: 1. How to enable NumLock at startup 2. It is possible to put and keep all the log (/var/log) to HDD? 3. How to enlarge /dev/root? I already format 256M

RE: [leaf-user] Bug in processing leaf.cfg? (Bering 1.2)

2004-07-20 Thread Tibbs, Richard
Thanks, Charles. That worked. Rick. -Original Message- From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 5:05 PM To: Tibbs, Richard Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bug in processing leaf.cfg? (Bering 1.2) Tibbs, Richard wrote: > Folks, > B

[leaf-user] LEAFCFG

2004-07-20 Thread M Lu
Hi, I tried to build a CD from 2.2b5 and inside the syslinux.cfg of the floppy-image I specify ..LEAFCFG=/dev/fd0:msdos,/dev/cdrom:iso9660 What I want is to use the file leaf.cfg from floppy if there is floppy inserted, or leaf.cfg on CD if there is no floppy when booting. However it works if th

[leaf-user] Please Help: How to turn on Nat Traversal in Bering?

2004-07-20 Thread Tibbs, Richard
Hello list: (reposting this -- got no replies from last week) In booting up Bering 1.2, one of the messages in auth.log is: Jul 16 13:07:15 firewall pluto[25864]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version0.5a) [disabled] How does one enable NAT traversal -- I am interested in allowing machines on

Re: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5 HDD Version Question

2004-07-20 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 20. Juli 2004 09:22 schrieb Chris Lee: > 3. How to enlarge /dev/root? I already format 256M HD partition, but only > few are used for the system. > Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/root 6144 5024 1120 82%

Re: [leaf-user] bering 1.2 does not dial out - strange behaviour

2004-07-20 Thread Thomas Wille
Dear Richard, Thanks for the quick answer. I got the following results: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A It is correct, isn't it? Anyway, all my other linux boxes have the same output. I also checked up the bios setup, and there I got the same outpu

Re: [leaf-user] LEAFCFG

2004-07-20 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
M Lu wrote: Hi, I tried to build a CD from 2.2b5 and inside the syslinux.cfg of the floppy-image I specify ..LEAFCFG=/dev/fd0:msdos,/dev/cdrom:iso9660 What I want is to use the file leaf.cfg from floppy if there is floppy inserted, or leaf.cfg on CD if there is no floppy when booting. However it wo

Re: [leaf-user] Please Help: How to turn on Nat Traversal in Bering?

2004-07-20 Thread Erich Titl
Hi Rick At 18:04 20.07.2004, you wrote: Hello list: (reposting this -- got no replies from last week) In booting up Bering 1.2, one of the messages in auth.log is: Jul 16 13:07:15 firewall pluto[25864]: including NAT-Traversal patch (Version0.5a) [disabled] How does one enable NAT traversal -- I

RE: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5 HDD Version Question

2004-07-20 Thread Peter Mueller
> 1. How to enable NumLock at startup Check your BIOS. AFAICT the LEAF distros won't have any tools like setleds to do this. Maybe you can ask nicely and KP or Eric will make you a package. It seems to be < 10k. Heck maybe busybox can do it.. > 2. It is possible to put and keep all the log (/

[leaf-user] Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5 - Time zone settings and e2fsck.

2004-07-20 Thread Luiz Carlos Farias
Bering Team: a) How I can set the timezone in Bering-uClibc_2.2-beta5? Apparently, the file /etc/localtime is ignored for Bering. I downloaded the correct file for my time zone from Charles Steinkuehler's web site. But does not work. b) The utility "e2fsck" is not present in hdsupp.lrp? Thank y

Re: [leaf-user] bering 1.2 does not dial out - strange behaviour

2004-07-20 Thread Richard Doyle
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 10:58, Thomas Wille wrote: > Dear Richard, > Thanks for the quick answer. > I got the following results: > > ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A > ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A > > > It is correct, isn't it? Anyway, all my other linux boxes have the same > out