Re: [leaf-user] Bandwidth throttling

2006-11-14 Thread Huy Bui
Thanks What i meant was i am using 2.4.2 on the production router at the moment. Is tc4shorewall supported in this version. I'll see what i can do with shorewall. Thank you again Huy - Original Message - From: "KP Kirchdoerfer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:41

[leaf-user] Multiple dhcpd-intervals invisible in webconf

2006-11-14 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear All, I have my Bering up and running very well with two interfaces inwards. Dnsmasq services them both without complaint. However, I get only to see one of the two lease intervals when using the DNS/DHCP-page of webconf in 'basic'. Of course, all is well on the 'general- info'

[leaf-user] Cosmetic patches for webconf and a suggestion for more formatting of logfiles

2006-11-14 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear All, attached is a small file to accomplish some minor cosmetic facelifting. The patching only concerns spacing and aligning in the table of logfiles.cgi and some new space below buttons in other webconf pages. Nothing much, but makes reading smoother. When using the webconf

Re: [leaf-user] Cosmetic patches for webconf and a suggestion for more formatting of logfiles

2006-11-14 Thread KP Kirchdoerfer
HI Mats; Am Dienstag, 14. November 2006 15:54 schrieb Mats Erik Andersson: > Dear All, > > attached is a small file to accomplish some minor > cosmetic facelifting. There was no attachment. It's possible that the list does not allow attachments and it has been stripped. In that case you m

Re: [leaf-user] My criticism of 'Configuration changed ...' in lrcfg

2006-11-14 Thread Eric Spakman
Hi Jim, Mats Erik, > >> Dear All, >> >> >> immediately upon entering the setup command lrcfg of Bering, I encounter >> the two options >> >> c) Configuration changed since last save, d) Configuration changed from >> distribution. >> >> I do not think they are phrased well enough, simply >> because

Re: [leaf-user] Cosmetic patches for webconf and a suggestion for more formatting of logfiles

2006-11-14 Thread Martin Hejl
Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > attached is a small file to accomplish some minor > cosmetic facelifting. unfortunately, patches don't work on this list, unless they're posted inline (which usually doesn't work well for anything that's not extremely short). If you have a sourceforge account,