Re: [leaf-user] DST Change Files

--- Roger McClurg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did anyone create new files for the Daylight Savings > Time change? I > realize I can fudge the time zone values to EST4EDT, > but then I have to > set it back and at the end of DST put it back. > > I run the gamut of NIX machines so I've applied

Re: [leaf-user] shorewall package

--- KP Kirchdoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2007 02:20 schrieb Brett > Moss: > > Hello, > > I just noticed shorewall version 3.4-beta3 was > added > > to the packages area of the site, but it shows in > the > > released ar

[leaf-user] shorewall package

Hello, I just noticed shorewall version 3.4-beta3 was added to the packages area of the site, but it shows in the released area not the testing area. Is it possible to get to version 3.2.8 somehow? Thank you, Brett __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam?

Re: [leaf-user] No DHCP address to the DMZ :-(

--- Craig Caughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Eric, > The only thing I have done to get things up and > running is: > > I've uncommented > "dhcp-range=192.168.1.1,192.168.1.199,12h" in the > /etc/dnsmasq.conf file. Do I need to do something > different? > > Also, should I add another inter

Re: [leaf-user] can't insmod 3c59x

--- Eric Spakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Bret, > > The error you see normally means no device is found > at all, do you see any > output in "dmesg" or on screen that the card is > actually found? > > Eric > Hello Eric, I'm a bit embarassed, you hit it right on. The box had been o

[leaf-user] can't insmod 3c59x

Hello, I'm trying to load 3c59x.o module on Bering uClibc 2.4. other modules load properly, but this one fails time and time again with init_module: 3c59x: No such device I have tried to re-download the module package, re-download and make a new Bering disk, all with no success. Same machine work

Re: [leaf-user] Dual Netgear FA310TX cards on Bering 1.2

hi, there are two tulip drivers in the modules package. try the other one. i am using the same cards with the module that is sized 49501 (dont recall right now which is which) brett --- Geoff Catlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to get Bering 1.2 running using all > the default op

Re: [leaf-user] eth assign to NIC problem

sorry, i did miss that totally. no more replying before the second or third cup of coffee for me brett --- Lynn Avants <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 28 March 2003 09:54 am, Brett Moss wrote: > > hi, > > i think if you edit your modules package and list > your

Re: [leaf-user] eth assign to NIC problem

hi, i think if you edit your modules package and list your modules in the order you want the cards assigned it will take care of your problem. of course be sure to back up the modules package. brett --- Otto_Halák_-_TeleLarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all! > > Is it possible to assign et

Re: [leaf-user] Symantec

hi, while the docs recommend against using dns names the ability is there with 1.3.9 and later, if i'm not mistaken. http://www.shorewall.net/configuration_file_basics.htm#dnsnames i'd say if it works for you use it, at least try it on a test box if possible. brett --- Homer Parker <[EMAIL PR

Re: [leaf-user] Speakeasy

i've used them for 2-3 years now. they are very good. fantastic uptime and little or no BS for people running servers. brett --- Matt Schalit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone using them for DSL? > > My buddy just got two static ip's (608Kbs/128Kbps) > and a self-install DSL kit w/external