sterday. I realized the information was wrong after looking in my old
copy of "Upgrading and Repairing PCs" p203.
> >From: Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image
> >Date: 15 Apr 20
peeds than the 486 DX: 16, 20, 25, and 33 MHz"
>From here:
http://lowendpc.com/tech/486.shtml
S
>From: Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image
>Date: 15 Apr 2002 09:36:51 -0700
>
>On Mo
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:36, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:19, Mark Plowman wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Has anyone got a Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image somewhere that I can
> > use for colleague who wants to use a 486 SX?
>
> Mark,
> All 486s have FPUs. The SX designator on a 4
> Has anyone got a Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image somewhere that I can
> use for colleague who wants to use a 486 SX?
>
> Any pointers/URLs gratefully accepted...
I don't have any available, although if you're in a real pinch, you can use
the 2.2.16 kernel:
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/files/ker
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:19, Mark Plowman wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Has anyone got a Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image somewhere that I can
> use for colleague who wants to use a 486 SX?
Mark,
All 486s have FPUs. The SX designator on a 486 indicates a lack of
on-board L1 cache. The standard kernel s
Dear All,
Has anyone got a Dachstein *non-FPU* Kernel image somewhere that I can
use for colleague who wants to use a 486 SX?
Any pointers/URLs gratefully accepted...
Greetings
Mark Plowman
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://list
