> Okay, that sort of makes sense! I can only try! Can you email these to
> mr or should I download them from someplace?
Um...e-mail what? If you mean the 2.2.19 kernels with Disk-On-Chip support,
send me an e-mail saying you've read, understand, and agree to the M-Systems
license (on their web
Okay, that sort of makes sense! I can only try! Can you email these to
mr or should I download them from someplace?
--Pat
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Just to clear on this issue.
> >
> > I would take my DOC, format it to dos, put syslinux on it
> >
> > Copy the DOC ke
> Just to clear on this issue.
>
> I would take my DOC, format it to dos, put syslinux on it
>
> Copy the DOC kernel and module to the DOC, along with the rest of the
> contents of the Dachstein floppy (going small first)
>
> and presto, it works?
Or not...
> What did I miss? I know it's not th
Just to clear on this issue.
I would take my DOC, format it to dos, put syslinux on it
Copy the DOC kernel and module to the DOC, along with the rest of the
contents of the Dachstein floppy (going small first)
and presto, it works?
What did I miss? I know it's not that easy.
--Pat
On Mon,
Hi Charles,
> > Have anybody tried to use Debian's mkinitrd to build the initrd?
> > I am using the Debian's 2.4.17 kernel source.
>
> If you want to use an unpatched 2.4 kernel, I suggest you at
> least start
> with the contents of root.lrp from a distribution image. Just make a
> ramdisk (
> I am trying to compiling it myself. Instead of patching the
> kernel, I am trying to figure how to use the initrd to load
> root.lrp, then bootstrap from there. I am seeing some rather
> strange things, like some binaries cannot be executed (ae, ash)
> while others are fine (bash). It is prob
ay, January 07, 2002 6:40 AM
> To: Bao C. Ha
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Kernel w/ DOC support
>
>
> Well, this is currently not real high on my todo list, and when I get
> around to playing with MTD support, I'll probably be hacking
> to code t
At 2002-01-07 12:32 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> > Would that 2.2 kernel be compatible with Dachstein? Do modules have
> > to be re-configured?
>
>Yes, it's basically the 2.2.19 Dachstein kernel with the M-Systems DOC
>patches applied.
Charles,
If you add DOC support to Dachstein, are yo
> Would that 2.2 kernel be compatible with Dachstein? Do modules have to be
> re-configured?
Yes, it's basically the 2.2.19 Dachstein kernel with the M-Systems DOC
patches applied.
> Other gotchas?
Since it's a binary-only module (no source available and not GPL'd) you can
only distribute the
Would that 2.2 kernel be compatible with Dachstein? Do modules have to be
re-configured?
Other gotchas?
--Pat
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> Well, this is currently not real high on my todo list, and when I get
> around to playing with MTD support, I'll probably be hacking
Well, this is currently not real high on my todo list, and when I get
around to playing with MTD support, I'll probably be hacking to code to
support a DOC2000 plugged into the ROM socket of a network interface...if
you want a 2.4 kernel with MTD, you'll probably have to compile it yourself
:(
N
Charles Steinkueler (sp ? sorry charles) is/was working on this last time
I checked.
No update as of yet, maybe he'll be kind and give us his status.
I'm waiting ever so patiently (okay, not really) for this support also!
--Patrick
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Bao C. Ha wrote:
> Is there a pre-compil
Is there a pre-compiled kernel 2.4.x with DOC2000
support via mtd?
I have built a minimal Linux system that can boot
up from Grub. I would like to redo it in LEAF.
Thanks.
Bao
___
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net
13 matches
Mail list logo
